Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:46:17 -0500
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:RhuHf.49797$1e5.998551@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| You are obviously wrong because we measure Doppler
| shifts for light and we measure constant speed for
| light from both moving and stationary sources.
You can't measure doppler shifts of light
without a relative speed change of the light.
You are full of crap.
No relative speed change = No doppler shift.
Sheesh!
.
- References:
- Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: OG
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- From: Greg Neill
- Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- Prev by Date: Re: The board dropping the mass. (simultaneous stuff)
- Next by Date: Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
- Previous by thread: Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- Next by thread: Re: Speed gedanken time.. (time dilation problems 099)
- Index(es):