Re: Anyone want to have fun with time dilation calculations?

"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:yNWdnQvncsotG3PenZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mjvHf.49968$1e5.1002687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Well it's at least clear from the above that you've never taken
| English classes above about sixth grade level. Your sentences
| don't parse, and your punctuation is attrocious.

Dear Greg,
That is the biggest bunch of bull*** you have ever stated so far.
The typing I do on usenet is not something I would turn into an
English teacher. (I would check it more closely)

An English teacher is an audience of one. Usenet is
a potential audience of millions, with the posts
archived for perpetuity -- they will be mined for
information and topics for dissertations (especially
sociological and psychological) for years to come.
No doubt the "spaceman" persona will garner a certain
amount of curious attention. You might expect your
grandchildren to be asked about the "real" James
Driscoll, and whether he was as whacko in person as
his persona would let on.

So, you aren't embarrassed by your public display of
childish behavior when delivering your missives to
thousands, but you would be more careful (and no
doubt more polite and logical) if turning in a submission
to an English teacher. What does this say about you?

It says that you are a coward hiding behind the bastion
of the keyboard in order to satisfy your negative attention
masochism. You would not behave this way in a personal
setting because you cannot bear the thought of open ridicule.

It is also very irrelevant to the statements I am making.

You're not making any coherent statements. You've got
a one thought agenda, that being to simply gainsay
particular facets of physics theory in order to attract
attention to yourself.

But as usual, you point and look the other way instead of looking
what I am pointing at, since what I point at, frightens you.

What a maroon. All of your objections to modern physics
are categorically nullified by empirical evidence. There
is not a single thing that you rail about that is not
settled and laid to rest by empirical evidence. This makes
you an idiot or a jibbering idiot. You choose.


| Grade school schoolyard insults. Could it be that's where
| your education left off?

I treat Eric like I have been treated by him.
It is pretty sad that you both seem to leave phsyics
and start on the age insult and school insults
and grammar checking crap.
Yet I suppose that is all you can do since you can not
grasp anything else I state.

If you don't like being insulted, why do you do it to
others on such a regular basis?

If you could put your statements into a grammatically
correct form you might stand a chance of being taken
seriously (at least until the content is deciphered).

If you would avoid your tendency to launch scatological
insults at the drop of a hat your submissions might be
considered for their content rather than amusement. After
all this time that you have been haunting these newsgroups,
you have yet to come up with a single original contribution
really worthy of discussion, or actually help a younger
poster seeking guidance with a factual reply.

You have a history (very well documented thanks to usenet
post archiving) of simply denying empirical evidence and
ignoring what you choose. You ignore rebuttals that you
cannot respond to, and have been known to edit context
in order to make it seem as though your correspondent
was saying something other than intended.

In other words, you would appear to be a thoroughly
reprehensible creature. Your only saving grace is that
you are in some small way an amusing diversion for
others. If this is your only ambition in life, then you
have succeeded beyond all expectation. If this is the
legacy that you choose to leave your children, then
you could do no better then giving them access to
your usenet haunts right now. It would be interesting
to hear their take on your performance.


.

Quantcast