Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099


"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vO6dnSKPl-pDLnLeRVn-gw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"OG" <owen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:459q21F5n0gaU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:Mp-dnag97PwwM3LeRVn-sA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "OG" <owen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:459oi0F5lehjU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | The relative speed IS the transformation for the speeds between the
two
| > | frames. That's what a transformation is.
| >
| > So in your rubber ruler world.
| > You need to transform speeds between two frames?
| > There is not transformation needed.
|
| Of course you need to transform speed between the two frames, otherwise
they
| would be THE SAME SPEED.

How the hell do you get such crap?
They need no tranform bull*** to be 2 different speeds.

The difference is the definition of the transform.

| How simple is this ?

It is not simple, it is completely moronic.


| Oh go on then tell me how (A) can measure the seperation between two
lines
| without moving.

He did not do such,
He had to move to measure but only to make sure
one side was the 0 and the other side was the measurement itself.
Then once he finds such a physical measurement
he needs not move again.
How do you explain that a faster motion should not
get the same type of measurement?
You are stating the faster my car goes, the more incorrect
the speedometer is.
It is a joke that you just refuse to get.

So (A) had to move from 0 to first line to measure it
(B) also moved from 0 to first line to measure it - but (B) moved faster.

Why is (A)s measurement 'right' whereas (B)'s measurement is 'wrong' ?






.

Quantcast