Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science

"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Ouidndl95M-vKnLenZ2dnUVZ_v6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139783048.394322.265960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Spaceman wrote:
| > "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1139777673.296013.195540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | Just like Seto, Wilson, and spaceman, you simply don't know how to
| > | measure the length of a moving object or what requirements go into
that
| > | measurement.
| >
| > PD,
| > If you use such bad logic as
| > a length = a speed (such as the definition of the meter now)
|
| Nonsense, the definition of a meter is not a speed.

Bull***!
It is defined as the length of the path travelled by light in absolute
vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.

Well there you go. You said it yourself: it's a length.


(it is a "speed")
You are incorrect by 100%.

You're not even wrong, which is a pretty remarkable
thing to be so consistently.


.

Quantcast