Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: "Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 23:33:20 -0500
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:--idneuF_KDyfnLeRVn-qQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:h9RHf.3364$T35.130353@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Try reading the whole thing,
| > It is a length traveled at a certain amount of time (speed)
|
| Right. A length.
Correct,
a length = a length at a certain time (a speed)
hence the
a distance = a speed.
supidity you don't get.
Good heavens, James can't even put the simple
definition of a standard into practice without
screwing up. He never ceases to amaze with the
depth of his ignorance and ineptitude.
James can't understand math, can't do simple
physics, and can't even keep units straight
in equations, nor does he evidence the slightest
hint that he might know why this could be important.
It would seem that the only things James is competent
at is lying and swearing.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- References:
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: PD
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Prev by Date: Re: serious question on Australian scientists
- Next by Date: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Previous by thread: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Next by thread: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|