Re: Thermodynamics
- From: "Doune" <doune60@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Feb 2006 08:26:54 -0800
Dear Andrew
Many thanks for taking time to reply
After replies in other posts, I've modified this to "Energy dissipates
via the most efficient route" or "most efficient route" instead of
"available route" - although I meant it to be the same thing. It was
just I first considered the results of Yang and Lee (on weak
interaction's violation of the law of parity conservation), to be
counter-intuitive. I expanded it to cover all instances rather than
limiting it to a binary option.
Gibbs free energy concerns the energy which is available for doing
work, not the process or mechanism of exchange (e.g. it could equally
be used for convection or conduction). The idea I am putting forward is
very basic and much simpler than the derived concept of Gibbs, that is:
exchanging energy *always* exploits the most efficient (i.e. easiest)
route.
If you mean tunnelling in the quantum mechanical sense, then again I am
not concerned with what the process is, just that if there is an
exchange of energy that it exploits the most efficient route. In the
original post, I simply meant that there must be a process or route
available to exchange energy (a binary Yes or No option). Now I have
expanded this to mean that when there are multiple routes available, as
is generally the case, then the exchange is via the most efficient
route.
Best regards
SCW
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Thermodynamics
- From: PD
- Re: Thermodynamics
- From: Andy Resnick
- Re: Thermodynamics
- References:
- Thermodynamics
- From: Doune60
- Re: Thermodynamics
- From: Andy Resnick
- Thermodynamics
- Prev by Date: Re: Fraud in Experimental and Theoretical Science
- Next by Date: Re: Speed gedanken time (repaired) time dilation 099
- Previous by thread: Re: Thermodynamics
- Next by thread: Re: Thermodynamics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|