Re: Is it our math letting us down?

Borne wrote:
Note the electron doesn't even feel the strong force. It only
feels the electromagnetic force.

You are wrong in this assumption. Cooper pairs and the Casimir effect
are two physical examples of the electrons binding due to the strong
force. The Casimir effect equation is mathematically identitical to
the strong force law of the electron. If you read my white paper, you
would know this.

Anyway. I also believe an
Aether is possible but also believe in Standard Model mass
energy paradigm.

Belief is everybody's right. You can believe in whatever you want.
But if you take the time to fully understand the definitions and
equations of the APM, your belief in the mass/energy paradigm will be
shaken to its foundation. Mine was. Let your scientific views be
guided by knowledge, not belief. That will save a lot of unnecessary
conflict.

The new dynamic aether model has to
be backward compatible or you'll have all kinds of problems
and inconsistencies.

No, the Aether Physics Model must be entirely based upon empirical data
and a consistent adherence to the rules of math. There can be no
political interference by saying that the model has to agree with some
Catholic dogma or mass/energy dogma.

In the sense that the APM is entirely derived from the same empirical
data as the Standard Model, the two systems are already compatible.
But the two systems are different because they interpret the data
differently. To say that the APM must agree with the SM interpretation
is like saying the APM has no right to exist in spite of its many
successes.

I'll return to you later when I have time
and give more details what I think is wrong with your model and
how it is in severe conflict not just with the current theoretical
paradigm but the experimental arena as well.

I would greatly appreciate a direct critique of my work. But please,
don't do like the other guys do and say, "the standard view is x,
therefore you are wrong." Point out actual errors in the math or
places where I applied certain data where it was wrong to apply. Show
me that my geometrical interpretations are wrong. Address the theory
and show why it is inconsistent with itself. Do not just make
unfounded comments that because I have violated Papal decree number 374
or disagreed with Einstein, Bohr, Heisenberg, or some other physicists
interpretation then I am therefore wrong.

But at least you
tried to develope the aether paradigm. It needs many
modifications if it has to be compatible to our experimental data.

Great. This is the kind of engagement that I have been looking for. I
don't ask for you to believe in me or my work, but simply to examine it
objectively and point to its actual qualities and quantities.

Dave

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Virtual Particles and Light Duality principle
    ... > which you can pick from a menu, physics is a monolithic edifice of ... > dynamics is governed by a wave function. ... >> I can accomodate the more unusual quantum interpretation ... > The elastic scattering differential cross section of electrons on ...
    (sci.physics)
  • PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 722 March 3, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
    ... The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News ... 240 ELECTRONS SET IN MOTION. ... might generate x rays. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The electron shell model is in challenge
    ... > the assumption that the charge of a nucleus with Z protons is Z*e. ... >> and not the stupid electrons around it. ... > That's a completely unsupported assertion. ... only God can help you (physics teacher) ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: The electron shell model is in challenge
    ... > the assumption that the charge of a nucleus with Z protons is Z*e. ... >> and not the stupid electrons around it. ... > That's a completely unsupported assertion. ... only God can help you (physics teacher) ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Laws of Intelligence Examined
    ... interpretation, in which gravity is not a classical force. ... in which gravity remains a classical force. ... physics of relativity harder to understand. ... acceleration of a target body toward a source mass, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Loading