Re: Is it our math letting us down?

Borne wrote:
Interesting. You are quite creative.

Actually, I'm not. I didn't create anything, I discovered it. That is
just the way the physics works out when you analyze the data in the
manner that I did.

I have suggestion for you about HUP. See the following:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html

When people tell you that your model violate HUP by
having a neutron as made up of proton and electron.
Maybe a good response would be that when they
are bound as neutron. The proton and electon is not
the same as the separate proton and electron, meaning
to say the neutron is made up of potential-onn-electron
and potential-onn-proton which doesn't violate HUP
because their wavelength property gets disabled and
momentum = h/wavelength doesn't apply in the
neutron composing of the two onns. This is one of
the ways you can make it backward compatible with
HUP.

Your suggestion has merit and I will give it serious consideration.
Although, it really isn't necessary if the person takes the time to
understand the APM within the confines of its own limits, and not apply
the limits from a different paradigm.

When the structure of the quantum Aether unit is understood, it is easy
to see how the Aether must fold over and join with another by the
strong force. The proton and electron also bind with the electrostatic
force, which is why the neutron has neutral electrostatic charge. As
when two magnets bind, the total magnetism is accordingly increased,
when a proton binds with an electron the strong charge is also
increased. But in addition to the angular momentum of the electron and
proton, additional dark matter from the sea of dark matter is caught
between them, thus increasing the total angular momentum of the
neutron. And since the strong charge equation is;

chrg = h * Cd

then the strong charge of the neutron is increased by the additional
angular momentum caught in the binding.

The weakness of the proton/electron binding is due to the magnetic
moments of the electron and proton, which due to their differences in
mass are not in sync with each other. The magnetic moments are, in
turn, due to the balance of electrostatic and electromagnetic charges
of the onn in question as compared to the strong charge of an electron.


The APM is very detailed in its description of onn structure.

As I wrote the book I intentionally removed all I wrote that compared
the APM with the SM, as it made the theory look like it is anti-SM.
The APM is not anti anything. It stands on its own as a complete
paradigm. The fact that other paradigms were established previously
has no bearing on the validity or usefulness of the APM, nor does the
presence of the APM invalidate any of the usefulness of any SM sub
theory.

Note you can't just remove HUP because the
wave properties of particles really exist and this is
the essence of Quantum Mechanics.

I'm not removing anything. It is your perception that makes you think
so. I am merely providing a different paradigm based upon different
definitions and assumptions for the same data. The APM is not an
attack on the SM, it is a complete theory of itself. What you are
doing is akin to attacking the French language because it doesn't
follow the grammar rules of the English language. Both languages are
useful for communicating, but have their own set of rules.

However, there are certain aspects of the APM that are superior to the
SM, such as the presence of a valid Unified Force Theory. The APM has
just been discovered. Its full potential has not yet been uncovered,
only the foundations of the theory. There is a lot of room for further
discoveries. Just in the past 24 hours I have become aware that a
dozen or so very influential physicists from Russia and the US have
been passing my paper around with great excitement. Apparently the APM
adequately quantifies the so-called "anomalous" data they have recorded
in their experiments. The opportunities for people on the USENET
groups to be the first to take the APM to new levels are quickly
diminishing.

So the only
way for the wavelength of the electron to fit into
the neutron is for the wavelength to be cancalled.
Wonder if you can fix it this way... because if you don't
and momentum = h/wavelenth still applies. A bound
electron in the nucleus would give 3.77 GeV.

So it is said. I'm really not interested in working out the problems
of the SM at this time. I'm too busy promoting my own theory to be
fixing other peoples' theories. Regardless of what HUP says, the fact
remains that a neutron decays to an electron and proton with a certain
amount of immeasurable angular momentum called an antineutrino. How do
you deal with that?

Well. About your 5 dimensional photon shape. Well. I'll attend
to it later. I'll first try to study General Relativity which
is already straining my mind to imagine and visualize
4D spacetime that is curvable. I'll first study the GR
field equations and SR lorentz transformation. Then
after I'm adept in relativity. I'll deal with your 5D aether
and go on either supporting it or debunking it (at will).
Try to talk first to the GR gurus such as Wormley
as they can more easily visualize your 5D aether as
they have mastered 4D spacetime (unless they didn't
use visualization but only mathemetical devices).

Sam doesn't study new theories, only the stuff that is taught in
classrooms.

Also I'm studying Mitochondrial biology in addition to
GR/SR so I'd tend to your highly abstract model later as I
can't handle to all at once.

I have recently taken an interest in mitochondrial biology, too.

Hey. Clue: If you can explain the double slit experiment and
how the particle move in between the source and the detector
(maybe you should write a separate web page for this)
as well as encompass HUP. Maybe the CIA guy at the
office may open bigger eyes and lend you an ear.
Be flexible and modify your model as necessary to
really make it compatible with all particles data. You
haven't explored ALL of them yet so try to do so.

I have already done quite a bit. If I had a hundred million dollars to
work with, I wouldn't bother with anybody here on the newsgroups and
dedicate my whole life to fully fleshing out the theory and take
complete credit as the super genius of the Universe. But alas, my AGI
for last year was $680. That isn't much of a budget to survive on, let
alone single-handedly solve all the physics problems facing humanity.

If you won't discover Aether science. Somebody else will.

I already did. There is no Aether science without a proper foundation.
I have discovered the foundation for which all Aether science, and
indeed all future physics, will be based upon. If you won't take the
time to study the Aether Physics Model, somebody else will, and they
will claim the credit for new discoveries that you could have made.

Of course the final say depends on whether humanity is
ready for a science so advance it can make atomic bombs
a mere kids gloves.

Actually, the beauty of the APM is that it is not based upon bombs, as
the mass/energy paradigm is. The APM, for all its glory, is based upon
the fact that a non-material, omniscient creative force gave rise to
the physical Universe. When the world understands the APM, there will
be no need for paternalistic religions that crave the bombs of
mass/energy conversion. When the world understands that all existence
is a manifestation of life there will be a much greater appreciation
for life and less interest in the methods for destroying it. Quite
literally, the mass/energy paradigm is the science of the dark side of
the force, whereas the Aether/angular momentum paradigm is the science
of the good side of the force. This is why I am so interested in
getting the theory out. It has the potential to not only revolutionize
science, but religion as well.

In a world of savages where cartoons
fighting freaks lurk. The world may not be ready for a
hyper aether space/time TOE. In such case. For the sake
of the future and well being of the human race and
international security. Sacrifices can be made to delay
the release of the Correct Aether Theory for another century
or until humanity is ready for it. You sure don't want to set
humanity on a downward spiral to eternal ruins and darkness...

Be guided accordingly. Goodluck.

Thanks, but if you really have an interest in healing our civilization,
you really need to devote yourself to the APM as I have and do your
part. Not only does the APM quantify the physical world, but also
significant aspects of our mental world as well. The APM shows the
mechanics for how the mind interacts with matter.

Dave

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
    ... constant w.r.t the observer *because* of the widely accepted - but totally untested view that the source could not possibly control the speed because light is a wave travelling in aether and it is the aether which controls the speed not the source. ... If it turns out that light is after all source dependent then a century of physics collapses like a pack of cards. ... Perhaps instead of ranting you would quote the bit which you feel justifies either the second postulate or the assumption of source independence. ... even though the electron beam that generated it travels at>0.999 c. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Magnetic Monopoles Found? Dual-Slit Expe Explained?
    ... interacting with the Aether particles. ... form of magnetism not described by Maxwell or an Aether derived ... you have to wipe out the entire physics foundation ... emit proton, electron, and anti-neutrino. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Thomson Aether Physics Under Scrutiny
    ... I read the following in another physics newsgroup where David ... Thomson who wrote the book "Secrets of the Aether" shared ... the electron and proton are angular ... dimensions of length and one dimension of time and call the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Ether havent we evolved beyond 1905??
    ... > electron back then? ... The MM expriment does not rule out an aether. ... What justification is there for the mainstream of physics to ... > Light and Electromagnetic waves DO NOT NESCESSARILY SLOW EACH OTHER ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is it our math letting us down?
    ... are two physical examples of the electrons binding due to the strong ... the Aether Physics Model must be entirely based upon empirical data ... In the sense that the APM is entirely derived from the same empirical ... To say that the APM must agree with the SM interpretation ...
    (sci.physics)
Loading