Re: Is it our math letting us down?


David Thomson wrote:
Borne wrote:
You might as well be asking me why cows have four legs. I presented a
theory for quantum structure. Can you show me where my math or data is
wrong? I thought you were asking *me* to be open-minded and unbiased?
Are you not open-minded enough to say, "your math is correct and you
use the proper data?"

Ok. Let's go back to the double slit experiment.

Actually, we have had enough of the double slit experiment. You said
you were going to critique my theory. Let's hear from you whether the
math is accurate and whether I am using the correct data or not.

You can't seem to undersand the subtle points. You use
the data of the Standard Model. That is the reasons why
I mentioned about SM. And your concept is not compatible
to it in the fundamental level. It's like QM vs GR. It's not
compatible. That's why they have to cook up string theory.
Your model is not compatible with either QM or Relativity.
It's worse. You have to cook up more things.


So your photon
is an expanding cardiod composes of angular momentum. It
behaves just like waves. When it hits the detector. The energy
of the cardiod is distributed to different atoms by each valence
electron storing a certain angular momentum. What happens
to the angular momentum stored by each electron. How
long can it store it? Your modelling may work in multiple
photon emissions because there is no way to tell which of
the "hits" are from what photons. But in one photon at a
time. This is where it blurs because whereas physics said
only one point receives a "hit". You said its multiple points.
At this point owing to insufficient data on my part. I don't
know how the detector do the detection. I'll try to find
it out in the net.

The so-called Einstein photon, the energy packet, is the quantity of
angular momentum that is absorbed in a fixed amount of time. The
Einstein photon is quantified in the SM exactly as I'm telling you it
works.

Angular momentum can be stored for up to the full age of the Universe.
Do you need proof of this? Electrons and protons are stored angular
momentum.

Now part of double slit experiment is single electron at
a time where it produces the same interference pattern.
Similarly. If you send one electron each day, it will
still build up interference pattern after a year. It's
like each electron can send a wave part and interfere
with itself So how can your electron cause interference
pattern, your photon spreads as expanding cardiod but
does your electron do it too??

I have already answered this question. Maybe you need to actually read
my posts rather than just use them as something to reply to and
pontificate your understanding of the SM?

Dave

The only way you can present your concept is to explain things
from your Aether model. Since you can't explain one electron
at a time experiment (no, you haven't mentioned it before).
Then you already lost right in the double slit... you can't
even reach photoelectric effect. And most of all. Your
aether paradigm is totally incompatible with Relativity.
Relativity is created and maintained for a century and
passed numerous tests that totally debunked the concept
of an aether. Although your aether is dynamic, but your
photon still use the aether units as medium for travel.
To make it compatible with Relativity, you have to
add so many Ad Hoc like time that is located in each
aether units, etc.

If you want to really present your model. You need to explain
how the subquantum or quantum structure give way to
explaining photons, interference, etc. The fact you want
to stop describing or talking about the double experiment
says your model has many holes. Since only you seem
to understand your model. This is why you were asked
to explain it.. for example.. how electron store angular
momentum.. the geometry. Yet you don't explain them and
yet ask for me to critique your model. How can I do that when
I need thorough understanding. You are given a chance
to present your model. We can settle it on all experimental
grounds. But if you don't want to. Well. Goodluck with
your aether model. You'd be asked the same questions
in the future especially those who is really interested in
your model. For those who are not interested. They won't
even ask you questions.

Borne

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is it our math letting us down?
    ... Are you not open-minded enough to say, "your math is correct and you ... is an expanding cardiod composes of angular momentum. ... to the angular momentum stored by each electron. ... But in one photon at a ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... release dark matter and thus produce a quantity of angular momentum we call ... What you are thinking is an energy distribution is really the ... that exists outside the Aether units. ... > | off the electron, which is also taken as a point particle. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Aether is the empty space in which the Universe sits
    ... release dark matter and thus produce a quantity of angular momentum we call ... What you are thinking is an energy distribution is really the ... that exists outside the Aether units. ... > | off the electron, which is also taken as a point particle. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is it our math letting us down?
    ... The photon shape in five dimensions looks like the one spin drawing. ... The photon is an exploding electron that expands and transfers its ... angular momentum from Aether unit to Aether unit. ... When the photon reaches the double slit it is a cardioid ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is it our math letting us down?
    ... The photon spreads to the collective shape of many Aether units. ... unit to another and the angular momentum weakens as it does. ... accumulate in the valence electron. ... have a wave characteristic to the detector. ...
    (sci.physics)