Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:07:24 -0500
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140163335.836885.295870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Spaceman wrote:
"PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140125515.430249.196830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To what "law of basic addition of speed" are you referring? What "law"
is being violated?
I did not say the word "law".
Again you prove you twist and never actualyl read.
What experimental evidence do you have that
velocities add like (u+v) and not like (u+v)/(1+uv/c^2)? Note that I
want *evidence*, not intuition. Your intuition sucks.
Experimental evidence that proves basic math is correct?
Ok,
take 1 gram of lead and add 1 gram of lead to it.
basic math states you will have 2 grams
1g+1g=2g
You do not get that do you?
Stupid space***, the abstract just eludes you.
What is 1L of ethanol + 1L of water?
Stupid Eric,
There you go trying to use addition for non identical units.
You truly are a moron.
You obviously are too stupid to comprehend that there is more than
"basic math", hence "basic".
You are too stupid to realize what identical means.
.
- References:
- The speed of light revisited
- From: Spaceman
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: PD
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: Spaceman
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: PD
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: Spaceman
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: PD
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: Spaceman
- Re: The speed of light revisited
- From: Eric Gisse
- The speed of light revisited
- Prev by Date: Re: The speed of light revisited
- Next by Date: Re: The speed of light revisited
- Previous by thread: Re: The speed of light revisited
- Next by thread: Re: The speed of light revisited
- Index(es):