Re: Physical wavelength vs relative wavelength


"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EAoJf.47071$T35.761712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fine. So why do you want to add another frame of
reference when you've already got a perfectly good
one to begin with? Surely the observer's frame of
reference is as good as any other? If not, what
would make another frame any better or more "at
rest"?

We add another frame because we wanted to
determine the others frames views of the starting frame.
You know Greg.
You don't even realize how much you twist huh?
You do not want to even think about
physical vs relative huh?
Is it simply against your religion?


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... Cartesian coordinates S to represent the frame of reference of the ... where it is reflected by the mirror. ... Nobody knows the essence of the physics they are talking ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... specific frame of reference. ... >> No. Einstein took the classical Conservation of Energy is both frames. ... >> had already calculated how the energy of radiation transforms between ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: .Re: Why all the fascination with E = mc^2 ??
    ... specific frame of reference. ... >> No. Einstein took the classical Conservation of Energy is both frames. ... >> had already calculated how the energy of radiation transforms between ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... Cartesian coordinates S to represent the frame of reference of the ... where it is reflected by the mirror. ... �Nobody knows the essence of the physics they are talking ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Galilean transformation explanation of MMX
    ... Cartesian coordinates S to represent the frame of reference of the ... where it is reflected by the mirror. ... Nobody knows the essence of the physics they are talking ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast