Re: The train and the light inside.


Spaceman wrote:
"Greg Neill" <gneillREM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nXIKf.10973$%14.309786@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4eqdnWApaOuHymbeRVn-iA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We have {observer (a)} standing next to the train tracks
observing from outside the train.
We also have {observer (b)}that is sitting in the front of the train.
The train is moving at 0.5c with reference to {observer (a)}
Inside the train, a light is turned on at the back of the train.
(lightsource D)
If it travels to the front of the train and hits {observer (b)}
so...

What speed would the light be doing when it hit the front
of the train according to {observer (a)}?
and..
What speed would the light be doing according to {observer (b)}
How can both be measuring this light to be c?
Please show the math that will show that both (a) and (b) would
measure c for the light if you prefer to use math at all.

The equivalent experiment has been done; both
observers see the speed of light as c.

Bull***.
For one to see c, the other would see a violation of c.

So, observer (a) sees the speed of the light as

(0.5c + c)/(1 + 0.5c*c/c^2) = 1.5c/1.5 = c

Then observer (b) will say the light hit him at 0.5c
if (a) only sees c.
LOL

Were you expecting anything different?

Yup,
a person with a non brainwashed brain to answer.
but of course I did not get such..
LOL

And when did you do your experiment that proved that they don't measure
the same speed c? The word "bull***", while one of my favorite
expressions, is not proof of anything. Stop expecting the world to
adhere to your own personal beliefs and maybe you'll be able to
advance. But maybe I'm expecting too much from someone who disagrees
even with basic algebra.

.

Quantcast