Re: The train and the light inside.
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:43:00 -0500
"Igor" <thoovler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140550474.168851.260960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And when did you do your experiment that proved that they don't measure
the same speed c?
The problem is, how could they?
An outside observer could not measure
c for what an inside observer is measuring c for already.
the relative speeds are being ignored if such is true.
and in turn that means light itself ignores the rest of
relativity and that is some dang magical light to do that.
LOL
The word "bull***", while one of my favorite
expressions, is not proof of anything. Stop expecting the world to
adhere to your own personal beliefs and maybe you'll be able to
advance. But maybe I'm expecting too much from someone who disagrees
even with basic algebra.
Basic algebra?
I don't disagree with such at all.
It is the basic algebra is telling you you are wrong to use
Lorentz at all.
Sheesh!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The train and the light inside.
- From: Igor
- Re: The train and the light inside.
- From: tomgee
- Re: The train and the light inside.
- References:
- The train and the light inside.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: The train and the light inside.
- From: Greg Neill
- Re: The train and the light inside.
- From: Spaceman
- Re: The train and the light inside.
- From: Igor
- The train and the light inside.
- Prev by Date: Re: The speed of light revisited
- Next by Date: Re: compressed air receiver flow
- Previous by thread: Re: The train and the light inside.
- Next by thread: Re: The train and the light inside.
- Index(es):