Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 16:30:11 GMT
kenseto wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FM5Lf.791987$_o.696208@xxxxxxxxxxxx
kenseto wrote:
Herein lies the problem: The main concepts of modern physics can be
wrong,
counterintuitive and incomplete. This is the reason why your students
are
reisiting your efforts. To do a better job I suggest that you explain
why
these main concepts are valid and emphasize that they are not the final
words.
Ken Seto
Thanks for registering as a crack Seto
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ken+H.+Seto%22+site%3Awww.crank.net
Modern physics is empirically sound and is *not* the reason why
student don't want to work hard.
Wormy is a runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their *** like
gourmet puppy chow. An *** who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR
Ken Seto
Why do you have a problem with special relativity. The observations
confirm the theory--What do you find wrong about it?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- From: kenseto
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- References:
- Teaching physics to biology students
- From: lgardner
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- From: kenseto
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- From: kenseto
- Teaching physics to biology students
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein's Theory 'Improved'?
- Next by Date: Re: From effectively no entropy to effectively infinite dissipation.
- Previous by thread: Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- Next by thread: Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- Index(es):