Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: "T Wake" <taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:13:11 -0000
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u9CdnXLjeuzFRZzZRVn-iQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<matt271829-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140921433.256606.319190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I haven't been following all these follow-ups, but FWIW I get the
maximum (final) speed of the rocket to be e * Log(1 + m1 / m2), where
m1 is the initial mass of fuel, and m2 is the mass of the rest of the
rocket. So a 10:1 ratio of fuel to rest of rocket, with e = 500, would
give a final speed of 1199 m/s, while a 9:1 ratio (possibly what was
meant) would give a final speed of 1151 m/s.
So how long would it take for such to get to the
speed predicted?
Instantly I guess huh?
Since you have no timing factor?.
and.
half way through the entire burn process,
the equation would no longer be valid since then the ratio
would be 5:1 ?
So, you use no timing function of the rocket at all?
It all seems a bit "lost in reality" to me.
Your lack of understanding doesn't, in any way, invalidate the theory.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- References:
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Prev by Date: Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE
- Next by Date: Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Previous by thread: Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Next by thread: Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|