Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 13:16:59 -0500
"T Wake" <taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ypWdneWZ8b8icpzZRVnyhA@xxxxxxxxxxxx
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:u9CdnXLjeuzFRZzZRVn-iQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<matt271829-news@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1140921433.256606.319190@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I haven't been following all these follow-ups, but FWIW I get the
maximum (final) speed of the rocket to be e * Log(1 + m1 / m2), where
m1 is the initial mass of fuel, and m2 is the mass of the rest of the
rocket. So a 10:1 ratio of fuel to rest of rocket, with e = 500, would
give a final speed of 1199 m/s, while a 9:1 ratio (possibly what was
meant) would give a final speed of 1151 m/s.
So how long would it take for such to get to the
speed predicted?
Instantly I guess huh?
Since you have no timing factor?.
and.
half way through the entire burn process,
the equation would no longer be valid since then the ratio
would be 5:1 ?
So, you use no timing function of the rocket at all?
It all seems a bit "lost in reality" to me.
Your lack of understanding doesn't, in any way, invalidate the theory.
Your lack of actual physics in this post only validates your non physics
reply to this thread.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: T Wake
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- References:
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- From: T Wake
- Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Prev by Date: Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Next by Date: Re: Article unifies the four forces
- Previous by thread: Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Next by thread: Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|