Re: Konstantin Tsiolokvsky was wrong?!


"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Z7-dnWubUPWqZpzZnZ2dnUVZ_tSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"T Wake" <taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VcudnbIjJKLnZJzZRVnyuQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx
You rubbish a theory which is actually successful in predicting the speed
of rockets (amongst other things).

What do you have that works better?

Dear T Wake,
Get freakin life, the discussion here is about
the equation itself, not about whether I have a better one.
If you do not wish to actually contribute to the discussion
itself, *** off and die.
Sheesh!

Sorry, are your meds wearing off now?

The discussion is about the equation. I agree. I think it works based on the
fact it CORRECTLY describes what happens in reality and is used almost daily
for anything which is launched and carries a payload.

You say it doesnt work. But have no way of saying why it doesnt work (in the
face of the evidence) and no idea of how to fix it.

This is no discussion.


Where is the freakin' timing function involved in the
equation at question here?

This has been answered. Can you explain where this formula goes wrong?

If you have no answer, don't answer and fuch off.

You are such a polite young man. I bet your parents are so proud of you.

If you have an answer, give it, and stop your farting in the room.

Its been answered. The fact you don't understand the answer isn't relevant.


.

Quantcast