Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:12:49 -0500
On 28 Feb 2006 04:09:41 -0800, "alextangent"
<alex_mcd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, to my question. I've not found any material that describes this
adequately.
What gives quantum mechanical effects their statistical nature at
macroscopic levels; for instance, radioactive decay?
Physicists do not know why subatomic interactions are probabilistic.
They don't care. Nevertheless, the reason is rather simple: nature is
discrete and there is only one interaction time. Since precise
interaction times cannot be processed, nature is left with only one
alternative in order to conserve energy in the long run. It uses
probability to time interactions (decays).
By the way, the same argument can be made to support the notion that
there really is only one speed in nature, c. Nothing can move faster
or slower. We observe macroscopic speed that are less than c but these
consists of a combination of minute rests and jumps. Truth is, a
discrete universe is a probabilistic universe, by necessity.
Remember. You first heard it on usenet, the ultimate, non-elitist peer
system where the next major scientific breakthroughs will emerge.
ahahaha...
Louis Savain
Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix It:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Where do the sane post?
- From: alextangent
- Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
- From: alextangent
- Where do the sane post?
- Prev by Date: Re: Where do the sane post?
- Next by Date: Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
- Previous by thread: Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
- Next by thread: Re: Statistical nature of quantum mechanics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|