sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: Starbles
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• T.J., what problems do _You_ face these days ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: So
  • From: stockbauer_don
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: stockbauer_don
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Watch the Monkey!
  • From: Jim McGinn
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: Igor
• Re: graviton
  • From: Herb Martin
• Re: Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: Tareq
• Re: Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Has there anyone read about the Lecture on Physics by Feynman
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: funda Q
  • From: CWatters
• Where is the angular symmetry in electronic orbitals??
  • From: Tareq
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Has there anyone read about the Lecture on Physics by Feynman
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Has there anyone read about the Lecture on Physics by Feynman
  • From: liuge10@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Electrolysis.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: funda Q
  • From: PD
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Evets
• Re: Matter/Anti-Matter and global curvature asymmetry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: double slit expirement
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity 35: Another Look At Null Sets, Universes, Multiverses and QCD, QG
  • From: OsherD
• Matter/Anti-Matter and global curvature asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: double slit expirement
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: funda Q
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: funda Q
  • From: mrnick
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: We're both in the same boat.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Life is hard for poor jeff.
  • From: T Wake
• funda Q
  • From: oldton
• Re: double slit expirement
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment,not theory
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Determinism, -- a.k.a. physicalism --, has never been so alive and well.
  • From: boson boss
• Auxetic materials.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: We're both in the same boat.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment,not theory
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WHO DISCOVERED GOD FIRST...?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment,not theory
  • From: hanson
• We're both in the same boat.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What's wrong with KK theory? It's testable!
  • From: Starbles
• Re: graviton
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Nanoscale boost for superwires
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What's wrong with KK theory? It's testable!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: graviton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: double slit expirement
  • From: Peter
• [Help!]aboat Ultrafast magnetization reversal by picosecond optical pulse
  • From: maggie.l
• Re: graviton
  • From: Herb Martin
• Re: General Relativity and Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• What's wrong with KK theory? It's testable!
  • From: Starbles
• double slit expirement
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: Life is hard for poor jeff.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Edwards
• Re: I pay a shit load of money and I can't have a single visitor.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I pay a shit load of money and I can't have a single visitor.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Double Slit
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Edwards
• Re: Life is hard for poor jeff.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: stop crying, talk science.
  • From: T Wake
• I pay a shit load of money and I can't have a single visitor.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: graviton
  • From: Dave Lister
• T_Wake, Stop harassing me. You're helping no one.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: T Wake
• Re: graviton
  • From: Dave Lister
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Post some science then
  • From: T Wake
• T_Wake, Stop harassing me. You're helping no one.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: T_Wake, Please take your Skanky_Ass stupidity somewhere else.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Jeff - you arent my type
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Jeffs medication is wearing off
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• T_Wake, I'll help you look for it if you want.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• T_Wake, f_ck off you Shit_for_Brains bastard.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Jeff Is Feeling Hard Done By
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: puppet_sock
• T_Wake, loiter somewhere else.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: graviton
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is it called?
  • From: OG
• Re: A future for nuclear power
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: A future for nuclear power
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Double Slit
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What is it called?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Double Slit
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: Double Slit
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: graviton
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Double Slit
  • From: CoreyWhite
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: onehappymadman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: graviton
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 34: QCD (Strong Force) vs Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 34: QCD (Strong Force) vs Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• graviton
  • From: Michael Lodman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment,not theory
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Starbles
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: What is it called?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment,not theory
  • From: Traveler
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Teach/Tour China Summer 2006
  • From: jmcbride@xxxxxxx
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
  • From: Evets
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A future for nuclear power
  • From: tj Frazir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: I could tell you I'm Bill Gates, so what ?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The net mass-energy of the cosmos is known to be _Negative_.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: God's dice are loaded.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Eric_Gisse, Why is your life so devoid of content ?
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Starbles
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: HALF-TERABIT PER SQUARE INCH DATA DENSITY FROM INPHASE TECHNOLOGIES BREAKS ALL RECORDS
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Helium 5.
  • From: Angelo
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: The Mpemba effect
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: What is it called?
  • From: srp
• Re: HALF-TERABIT PER SQUARE INCH DATA DENSITY FROM INPHASE TECHNOLOGIES BREAKS ALL RECORDS
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Starbles
• What is it called?
  • From: Starbles
• HALF-TERABIT PER SQUARE INCH DATA DENSITY FROM INPHASE TECHNOLOGIES BREAKS ALL RECORDS
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Eric_Gisse, Why is your life so devoid of content ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Helium 5.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The net mass-energy of the cosmos is known to be _Negative_.
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• God's dice are loaded.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Helium 5.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eric_Gisse, Why is your life so devoid of content ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Electrolysis.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: tomgee
• Sunlight -> Energy
  • From: Starbles
• Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment, not theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I could tell you I'm Bill Gates, so what ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Pushing nuclei to the extreme
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The Mpemba effect
  • From: Sam Wormley
• A future for nuclear power
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Pushing nuclei to the extreme
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Staying in tune with physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Quantum turbulence
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Does hot water freeze first?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: April Fool's Joke?
  • From: NTuser_Man
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T_Wake, you're _Only_ intent was to harass me.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tj Frazir
• An accurate result that can not be incrementally debugged.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• The net mass-energy of the cosmos is known to be _Negative_.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: T_Wake, you're _Only_ intent was to harass me.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Buy the Safeco Plaza near campus.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: April Fool's Joke?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: April Fool's Joke?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• April Fool's Joke?
  • From: NTuser_Man
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Edwards
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: If you're thinking of entropy...
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: srp
• Re: closer moon?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• closer moon?
  • From: mrdarrett
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Questioning your claims is not harassment
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• T_Wake, you're _Only_ intent was to harass me.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 771 March 29, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Igor
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Igor
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• The SR highway traffic paradox..was: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Radial Magnets
  • From: jcon
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: FrediFizzx
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 771 March 29, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Jonathan Lyons
• Re: Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Velocity addition fun.. LOL
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: FED UP
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Radial Magnets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: puppet_sock
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Radial Magnets
  • From: AndyBower
• Re: Buy the Safeco Plaza near campus.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: T Wake
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: jcon
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• "The Error in Relativistic Physics"
  • From: Evets
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: srp
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Ian Parker
• Buy the Safeco Plaza near campus.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Matter and antimatter
  • From: HelpmaBoab
• Re: European Space Agency demontrates Podkletnov's Gravitometric Effect
  • From: HelpmaBoab
• Matter and antimatter
  • From: Michael Lodman
• Re: What is meant by 'indeterminism' in QM?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Superconducting Gravimagnetiic Dynamo for Flying Saucers?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: mass deficit
  • From: Tito
• Re: I turned 725 USD into 2,500... not on T.J.'s scale, but good e...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: I turned 725 USD into 2,500... not on T.J.'s scale, but good e...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I turned 725 USD into 2,500... not on T.J.'s scale, but good en...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Big Bang Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 33: Vision in Cats vs Birds (vs Dinosaurs?)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Jet engine Contrail Formation ?
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Jet engine Contrail Formation ?
  • From: dutch101
• Re: Jet engine Contrail Formation ?
  • From: dutch101
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Jet engine Contrail Formation ?
  • From: Robert11
• Re: Quantum Gravity 32: Deconfinement Papers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: mass deficit
  • From: Gravityman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Edwards
• mass deficit
  • From: Tito
• I turned 725 USD into 2,500... not on T.J.'s scale, but good enough for me.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: asdf
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Poor_jeff_Still_needs_pity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Poor_jeff_needs_pity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: "God does not play dice with the Universe"
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• T_Wake, F_ck Off you little dweeb.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Incompetent moderator in [sci.physics.research]
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Incompetent moderator in [sci.physics.research]
  • From: Alf P. Steinbach
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: hetware
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Do photons have/deliver charge?
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Jeff_That_Wasnt_An_Answer
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Incompetent moderator in [sci.physics.research]
  • From: srp
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Incompetent moderator in [sci.physics.research]
  • From: jcon
• Re: Nothing lasts forever, you know.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: T Wake
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quantum Gravity 32: Deconfinement Papers
  • From: asdf
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Incompetent moderator in [sci.physics.research]
  • From: Alf P. Steinbach
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: jcon
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Evets
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Optical rotation sheds light on vacuum
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: "God does not play dice with the Universe"
  • From: hetware
• Re: Optical rotation sheds light on vacuum
  • From: RP
• Re: "God does not play dice with the Universe"
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: "God does not play dice with the Universe"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: [OT] what happened to the girl
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Optical rotation sheds light on vacuum
  • From: Starbles
• "God does not play dice with the Universe"
  • From: hetware
• Re: Quantum Gravity 32.1: Deconfinement and Jost Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 32.1: Deconfinement and Jost Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 32.1: Deconfinement and Jost Functions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Optical rotation sheds light on vacuum
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Quantum Gravity 32: Deconfinement Papers
  • From: OsherD
• Cute kids often fall prey to those who'd get them high.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Your money can't raise the dead, T.J.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Optical rotation sheds light on vacuum
  • From: RP
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Nothing lasts forever, you know.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nothing lasts forever, you know.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does this work?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: [OT] what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: N.O. Levee Distaster? Just The Latest Army Corps of Engineers ...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Optical rotation sheds light on vacuum
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How do the electric multipoles change with a change of the origin?
  • From: Tom Geng
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Nick
• Re: "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: ma1ibu
• Wouldn't pigs fly first ? !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Question about GR.
  • From: carlip-nospam
• "The Properties of the Aether"
  • From: Nottub
• Re: Does this work?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: jcon
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Does this work?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: jcon
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Nick
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• What is meant by 'indeterminism' in QM?
  • From: hetware
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Igor
• Re: What is Socratic method?
  • From: hetware
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does this work?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does this work?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Units
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Units
  • From: Spaceman
• Units
  • From: robison
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Clues to African Archaeology Found in Lead Isotopes
  • From: technology_post
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: PD
• Re: Universe Expansion and Matter/Anti-Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Universe Expansion and Matter/Anti-Matter
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Inducing fission in otherwise stable atoms.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What is Socratic method?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What is Socratic method?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: curses
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Physics of Prussian Formation
  • From: hetware
• Re: Universe Expansion and Matter/Anti-Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: differential equations for the proton, neutron and electron relationship
  • From: Jack
• Re: differential equations for the proton, neutron and electron relationship
  • From: Jack
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Randy Poe
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: [OT] what happened to the girl
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Schrödinger's Cat
  • From: Peindexer
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: FED UP
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: hetware
• Re: God=G_uv CHILD GROWTH=HUBBLE EXPANSION
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Quantum spin and angular momentum?
  • From: clementmi
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: T Wake
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: hetware
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: Bohr's Blazon
  • From: T Wake
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: hetware
• Re: The sky isn't blue - it just looks blue because we don't see purple as well as blue
  • From: penseur
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • From: Basu
• Re: Universe Expansion and Matter/Anti-Matter
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: Ian Parker
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, March 27, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Bohr's Blazon
  • From: hetware
• Re: Bohr's Blazon
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: hetware
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: hetware
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Poor Jeff Relf
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Poor Jeff Relf
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nothing lasts forever, you know.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: T.J., all you have is poorly told tales of money.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Wormley is another fool, drunk on science fiction.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: hetware
• Re: Inducing fission in otherwise stable atoms.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does this work?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Physics of Prussian Formation
  • From: hetware
• Re: Physics of Prussian Formation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Universe Expansion and Matter/Anti-Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: E pur si muove
  • From: tadchem
• Re: How many colors in a rainbow?
  • From: tadchem
• Nothing lasts forever, you know.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: What is Socratic method?
  • From: tadchem
• Matter/anti-matter asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: hetware
• Different skills.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Bohr's Blazon
  • From: hetware
• What is Socratic method?
  • From: hetware
• Who first stated the principle of relativity?
  • From: hetware
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• E pur si muove
  • From: hetware
• Wave-particle duality
  • From: hetware
• Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
  • From: hetware
• Quantum spin and angular momentum?
  • From: hetware
• Mach's principle
  • From: hetware
• What is complementarity?
  • From: hetware
• Bohr/Einstein Debate
  • From: hetware
• Schrödinger's Cat
  • From: hetware
• Re: T.J., all you have is poorly told tales of money.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is spacetime inherently unstable?
  • From: donstockbauer
• K-meson decay asymmetry
  • From: hetware
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Is spacetime inherently unstable?
  • From: hetware
• Re: T.J., all you have is poorly told tales of money.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Physics of Prussian Formation
  • From: hetware
• Re: Question about GR.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Question about GR.
  • From: Starbles
• Does this work?
  • From: Starbles
• Does this work?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: RP
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Comet Sampler: Fire meets ice
  • From: Sam Wormley
• T.J., all you have is poorly told tales of money.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Universe Expansion and Matter/Anti-Matter
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Inducing fission in otherwise stable atoms.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Inducing fission in otherwise stable atoms.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: force of gravity fictional; Unification of Forces
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Order / disorder
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Poor Jeff Relf
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: [OT] what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: force of gravity fictional; Unification of Forces
  • From: boson boss
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Wormley is another fool, drunk on science fiction.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Order / disorder
  • From: boson boss
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Inducing fission in otherwise stable atoms.
  • From: Starbles
• Re:Relfs pathetic evasions
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Poor Jeff Relf
  • From: T Wake
• You just make me sick, T_Wake.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Who f_cking cares what T_Wake thinks ? !
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: curses
  • From: Cam Jones
• Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: George
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• "Dimensional Analysis and Relativity"
  • From: Tse
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quantum Gravity 31: Black Hole Binaries
  • From: OsherD
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Quantum Gravity 31: Black Hole Binaries
  • From: OsherD
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: European Space Agency demontrates Podkletnov's Gravitometric Effect
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: [OT] what happened to the girl
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Photon Detection
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Life is like that... full of knowns, unknowns and partially knowns.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GR's Equivalence_Principle.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: LawsonE
• Life is like that... full of knowns, unknowns and partially knowns.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: European Space Agency demontrates Podkletnov's Gravitometric Effect
  • From: Klueless
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: platopes
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Re: Quantum Gravity 30: QCD and Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 30: QCD and Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Neither of us will budge... oh well.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Black hole physics disproved, Go on Hawking!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 30: QCD and Gravitation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Wormley is another fool, drunk on science fiction.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Communicating isn't high up on T.J.'s list.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: Starbles
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: LawsonE
• Re: conservation of energy and angular momentum
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: T.J., I'll help you get images and text where you want, how you...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: conservation of energy and angular momentum
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., I'll help you get images and text where you want, how you...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: T.J., I'll help you get images and text where you want, how you...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: RP
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The one second light pulse paradox
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR's Equivalence_Principle.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• T.J., I'll help you get images and text where you want, how you want.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Send the meteor to me, along with a high quality digital camera.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Wormley's another fool drunk on science fiction.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The one second light pulse paradox
  • From: Peindexer
• GR's Equivalence_Principle.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The one second light pulse paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The one second light pulse paradox
  • From: Peindexer
• Re: conservation of energy and angular momentum
  • From: mmeron
• European Space Agency demontrates Podkletnov's Gravitometric Effect
  • From: nope
• Re: The one second light pulse paradox
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Relf_Jeff_You_Wouldnt_Know_The_data_if_it_bit_you
  • From: T Wake
• The one second light pulse paradox
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Confirming GR requires Uber_Tech, not Spaceman's monkey wrench.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• T_Wake, I'll pound the data into your thick skull.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• [OT] what happened to the girl
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: conservation of energy and angular momentum
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Take it from T_Wake, the guy who calls Map.GSFC.Nasa.GOV a crank site.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: conservation of energy and angular momentum
  • From: Spaceman
• Take it from T_Wake, the guy who calls Map.GSFC.Nasa.GOV a crank site.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• conservation of energy and angular momentum
  • From: Ian Lazarus
• Re: Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: uri
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Confirming GR requires Uber_Tech, not Spaceman's monkey wrench.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Adding miles.
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Adding miles.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Does WMAP prove or disprove whether the cosmological constant varies with time?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does WMAP prove or disprove whether the cosmological constant varies with time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• "The Arrow of Time"
  • From: Tse
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: A _Very_ sober thought.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Does WMAP prove or disprove whether the cosmological constant varies with time?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: What happened to the antimatter?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: What happened to the antimatter?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: A _Very_ sober thought.
  • From: asdf
• Quantum Gravity 29: Newtonian Antigravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: T_Wake, you just waste my time and make me sick.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A _Very_ sober thought.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: Templar
• Re: Does WMAP prove or disprove whether the cosmological constant varies with time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: asklucas
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: Peter
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park ateroid for sam
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ice 9 + 4, 5
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Does WMAP prove or disprove whether the cosmological constant varies with time?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Does WMAP prove or disprove whether the cosmological constant varies with time?
  • From: frank_k_sheldon
• Re: Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: platopes
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park ateroid for sam
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A new class of comets that orbit within the main asteroid belt
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Hydrophonics
  • From: tj Frazir
• Post them on a website for us all to see.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• RP, at least you're funny.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A _Very_ sober thought.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A _Very_ sober thought.
  • From: RP
• just found meteorite in burnt ship
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ice 9 + 4, 5
  • From: tadchem
• A _Very_ sober thought.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 24 March 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: RP
• Re: Ice 9 + 4, 5
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Towards a new test of general relativity?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Ice 9 + 4, 5
  • From: Mike Jr.
• What happened to the antimatter?
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 24 March 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: RP
• Re: Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: Behrooze
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• T_Wake, you just waste my time and make me sick.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Question about quarks.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: RP
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What the hell is MixMin.NET ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• What the hell is MixMin.NET ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• A WMAP-like telescope to record standard candles.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Rolling motion with slipping
  • From: Matthew . Vera
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Igor
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Igor
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: Igor
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: Igor
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: hanson
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Seeing the horn's infinitely long mouthpiece/flange.
  • From: T Wake
• Relativity is _Only_ about what an observer will see locally.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: tadchem
• Seeing the horn's infinitely long mouthpiece/flange.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: PD
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• How to build a homemade atomic bomb.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• All observers see a constant c because they're making local measurements.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: T_Wake's stupid/insincere questions.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• T_Wake's stupid/insincere questions.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Thermodynamics & 2nd law
  • From: darkpylon
• Re: Capacitors and dielectrics
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: hanson
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Light from stars gets dimmer with distance.
  • From: earthshrink
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about the universe.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Light from stars gets dimmer with distance.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life ofdrugsand...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The lack of B-mode polarizations from strong gravitatonal waves.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life ofdrugsand...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugsand...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: tj Frazir
• what happened to the girl
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Billionaire Fires Founding Scientists For Getting Parksinson's Disease
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Quantum Gravity 28: Entanglement Explains Magnetic Dipoles, Quark Bag Model, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• "The Aether and Charges of Charlatanism"
  • From: Tse
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: Mitzi
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: Tony
• Re: Light from stars gets dimmer with distance.
  • From: RP
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: uri
• Re: Light from stars gets dimmer with distance.
  • From: uri
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• HEY HANSON! READ THIS!
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about quarks.
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about the universe.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Question about the universe.
  • From: vps137
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about the universe.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about the universe.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• The lack of B-mode polarizations from strong gravitatonal waves.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: mmeron
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Fungi growth and brain infections in Pot smokers
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about the universe.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: unproven truth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• unproven truth
  • From: drin
• Question about the universe.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Light from stars gets dimmer with distance.
  • From: RP
• Re: Fungi growth and brain infections in Pot smokers
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Light from stars gets dimmer with distance.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The speed of sound/light in a particular medium is a constant.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Photon Detection
  • From: RP
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: RP
• Re: Question about quarks.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Jenkem High
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Jenkem High
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: dearcilla
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: dearcilla
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: OG
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugsand...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Question about quarks.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Question about quarks.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Question about quarks.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: hanson
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Question about quarks.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Jenkem High
• Re: Olber's Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: platopes
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: platopes
• Olber's Paradox
  • From: dearcilla
• Re: If you're going to masturbate like that, please do it somewhere else.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: If you're going to masturbate like that, please do it somewhere else.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: If you're going to masturbate like that, please do it somewhere else.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: If you're going to masturbate like that, please do it somewhere else.
  • From: T Wake
• Why Do Two Telescopes Have the Resolution of a Large One?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Photon Detection
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• If you're going to masturbate like that, please do it somewhere else.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Surface plasmons squeeze light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: asklucas
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: asklucas
• Re: Gliding Over Untraversable Terrain
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: asklucas
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 770 March 23, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Time and the constant (was Re: Constants)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• "Another Rebuff to General Relativity By Cosmological Observations"
  • From: Tse
• The curious case, of the mysterious, case.
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Parallel universes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugsand...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: It's the _Density_ of mass-energy that determines...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gliding Over Untraversable Terrain
  • From: tadchem
• Time and the constant (was Re: Constants)
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Fred Kavli Building opens to explore challenges in astrophysics and cosmology
  • From: technology_post
• Re: Work needed to move a mass on an equi-potential surface
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Hex
  • From: violet_verity
• Re: Parallel universes
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: PD
• It's the _Density_ of mass-energy that determines...
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Force of load of truck upon braking
  • From: asklucas
• Re: Gliding Over Untraversable Terrain
  • From: mattocast
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Jets from the blackhole accretion discs
  • From: Supertech
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Photon Detection
  • From: Quantum_Ranger
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: hanson
• Re: Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Incoherent boost for light surgery
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quantum Gravity 27: Monopoles, Tachyon Condensates, Inflatons, Instantons, etc.
  • From: Rastus Jones
• Re: Gliding Over Untraversable Terrain
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Line integral to calculate voltage
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Universality of the Dirac Principle
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Time Too Good to Be True
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugs and...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugs and...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugs and...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Line integral to calculate voltage
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26.2: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Gliding Over Untraversable Terrain
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Incoherent boost for light surgery
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Work needed to move a mass on an equi-potential surface
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugs and sexual abuse.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Work needed to move a mass on an equi-potential surface
  • From: Igor
• Incoherent boost for light surgery
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Taming Evaporation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Saving the 18 year old Ethen from a pointless life of drugs and sexual abuse.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Gliding Over Untraversable Terrain
  • From: mattocast
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: platopes
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: platopes
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Quantum Gravity 27: Monopoles, Tachyon Condensates, Inflatons, Instantons, etc.
  • From: hanson
• Re: History via Physics and Language (Humor)
  • From: hanson
• Re: History via Physics and Language (Humor)
  • From: hanson
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Work needed to move a mass on an equi-potential surface
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: History via Physics and Language (Humor)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: History via Physics and Language (Humor)
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Edmond Wollmann
• Re: Magnetic monopoles in electroweak theory (Was: GENERALIZATION OF MAXWELL's EQUATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD!!!!!!!!!)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: h is classical - a rigorous review of the radiation equilibrium (2006 March APS poster Q1.229)
  • From: earthshrink
• Re: The court system's priorites are nothing short of demonic.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Oops, my next animation is cyclohexane, not benzene.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: I'll be charging higher rates... or living on the streets.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time Too Good to Be True
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Time Too Good to Be True
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Technology has matured since Newton, live with it.
  • From: tj Frazir
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
  • From: Tse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Sunspot related effects
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Sunspot related effects
  • From: Rastus Jones
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The court system's priorites are nothing short of demonic.
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Scientific Talent and U.S. Economic Leadership
  • From: yared22311
• what happened to the girl
  • From: kstocklmeir
• what happened to the girl
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: CrankHater
• Re: Position Without Space
  • From: Traveler
• Sunspot related effects
  • From: CrankHater
• love and hate
  • From: dedanoe
• The court system's priorites are nothing short of demonic.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Technology has matured since Newton, live with it.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Technology has matured since Newton, live with it.
  • From: CrankHater
• Magnetic monopoles in electroweak theory (Was: GENERALIZATION OF MAXWELL's EQUATIONS OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD!!!!!!!!!)
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Technology has matured since Newton, live with it.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: Lynette
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: History via Physics and Language (Humor)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• History via Physics and Language (Humor)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Long cables to power arcjet rockets to orbit?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 27: Monopoles, Tachyon Condensates, Inflatons, Instantons, etc.
  • From: Rastus Jones
• Re: Constant Light Speed
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity 27: Monopoles, Tachyon Condensates, Inflatons, Instantons, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• Help Wanted Solving a Problem...
  • From: G.L. Cross
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time Too Good to Be True
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26.2: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26.2: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: hanson
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Constant Light Speed
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances p...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances p...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances p...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: ABarlow
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• Re: Monatomic hydrogen as fuel - need a low bond energy to single hydrogen atoms.
  • From: Wouter van Marle
• Re: Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Perihelium motion given by GR and by SR
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26.2: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Lecture of the Week: Could We Tell Life if We Saw It?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constant Light Speed
  • From: SCW
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: PD
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: PD
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Lecture of the Week: Could We Tell Life if We Saw It?
  • From: Wirt Atmar
• Re: Your example was too ideal, not physical enough.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26.2: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 26.2: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Your example was too ideal, not physical enough.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• Re: Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: 21000 posts by Sam the man.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: PD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Happy Hippy
• Re: Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Geomagnetic flip may not be random after all
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Long cables to power arcjet rockets to orbit?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: hanson
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: PD
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: 21000 posts by Sam the man.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Constants
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Speed of light in space is NOT always measured as c!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Time Too Good to Be True
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Constant Light Speed
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #1"
  • From: Tse
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Electric field caused by an infinite plane
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: 21000 posts by Sam the man.
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Constants
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Nuclear fusion.
  • From: Starbles
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Your example was too ideal, not physical enough.
  • From: Richard Mathar
• Re: Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: h is classical - a rigorous review of the radiation equilibrium (2006 March APS poster Q1.229)
  • From: Aage Andersen
• Technology has matured since Newton, live with it.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: Square and cube seconds as units on their own
  • From: Narasimham
• Re: Speed of light in space is NOT always measured as c!
  • From: solletica
• 21000 posts by Sam the man.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Why does the dark matter remain separate from the galaxy?
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Time Too Good to Be True
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Speed of light in space is NOT always measured as c!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: h is classical - a rigorous review of the radiation equilibrium (2006 March APS poster Q1.229)
  • From: RP
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: jimp
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Fog had finally lifted when we looked to see where we was at we're staring at a Colorado state policeman trooper cat
  • From: donstockbauer
• Fog had finally lifted when we looked to see where we was at we're staring at a Colorado state policeman trooper cat
  • From: Borderline909
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: Rastus Jones
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• BÖRJESSON'S LOGIC: OVE TEDENSTIG DESERVES THE NOBEL PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: Tony
• Re: is the big bang a white hole?
  • From: Jim Black
• Air Pressure In A Sauna
  • From: virtualadepts
• Speed of light in space is NOT always measured as c!
  • From: solletica
• Re: is the big bang a white hole?
  • From: Jumby
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances p...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Perihelium motion given by GR and by SR
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Perihelium motion given by GR and by SR
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: is the big bang a white hole?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• is the big bang a white hole?
  • From: marco 2
• Re: Why are Asians so good at math?
  • From: Richard Mathar
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Einstein's Aether
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Einstein's Aether
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Perihelium motion given by GR and by SR
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• WMAP Second Data Release
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Perihelium motion given by GR and by SR
  • From: thoovler
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Why are relativists so dumb when it comes to adding distances per time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: h is classical - a rigorous review of the radiation equilibrium (2006 March APS poster Q1.229)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• h is classical - a rigorous review of the radiation equilibrium (2006 March APS poster Q1.229)
  • From: earthshrink
• Quantum Gravity 26.1: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation" and Statistical Independence
  • From: OsherD
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: tj Frazir
• what happened to the girl
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Where does the heat go when the Mobile Aircon is inside the room?
  • From: Jumby
• Perihelium motion given by GR and by SR
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• "The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity"
  • From: Tse
• Where does the heat go when the Mobile Aircon is inside the room?
  • From: Novice
• Re: Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Constants
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Taylor approximations
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, March 20, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Taylor approximations
  • From: Zinc Potterman
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 26: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Quantum Gravity 26: How The Universe Developed "Non-Causation"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Position Without Space
  • From: platopes
• plzz... guys tell me why mass curves space-time?
  • From: eye-n-stein
• GR is ultra high tech compared to Newton's laws.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: RP
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: RP
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Panic in Einstein's Criminal Cult
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: time bandwidth product
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Constants
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Gravity and dreams.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity and dreams.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: hanson
• Re: what happened to the girl
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: John Baez
• Re: curses
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• what happened to the girl
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: tj Frazir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravity and dreams.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravity and dreams.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Constants
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Constants
  • From: RP
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constants
  • From: Igor
• Re: A sense of gravity
  • From: Igor
• Re: Walking on Custard
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: FED UP
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: John Schutkeker
• THE EQUATION'S OF MOTION FOR A RELATIVISTIC PARTICLE IN A CONSTANT GRAVITY-FIELD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: A sense of gravity
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Antigravity's Cat [Humor] 3: The Cheshire Cat and a Watched Pot Boils
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Antigravity's Cat [Humor] 3: The Cheshire Cat and a Watched Pot Boils
  • From: OsherD
• Dork matter, Bag bang, and the like.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Antigravity's Cat [Humor] 2: So How Do You Negate g or G?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Antigravity's Cat [Humor] 2: So How Do You Negate g or G?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• A sense of gravity
  • From: virtualadepts
• "The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity"
  • From: Gol
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Lorentz transformation of time
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Lorentz transformation of time
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: Constants
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Constants
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: So_Called randomness is naught but unknowns, I posit.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: mmeron
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: mmeron
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Antigravity's Cat [Humor] 2: So How Do You Negate g or G?
  • From: OsherD
• Antigravity's Cat [Humor] 2: So How Do You Negate g or G?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Gravity and dreams.
  • From: mike3
• So_Called randomness is naught but unknowns, I posit.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: OT PsychTest
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Antigravity's Cat [Humor]
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Constants
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: what really are Gravitons?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Gravity and dreams.
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: Walking on Custard
  • From: Phil Holman
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: uri
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: A New Triumph for Inflation
  • From: tomgee
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: tdp1001
• Antigravity's Cat [Humor]
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Light is so light, it doesn't sink.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Experiments debunk 'pseudogap' role in superconductivity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Constants
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Walking on Custard
  • From: Edward Green
• Cryogenic Phonon Scintillators to Help in Search for Dark Matter
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Constants
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: No future where light has already passed at the speed of light?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: T Wake
• Re: President Bush, doesn't care about America, Bird Flu
  • From: Hero
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• No future where light has already passed at the speed of light?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Light passes us? Going where exactly?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: mmeron
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: T Wake
• Light passes us? Going where exactly?
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Constants
  • From: T Wake
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: tadchem
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: T Wake
• A new magetic phenomenon that will improve RAMs and increase computer hard drive capacity
  • From: technology_post
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• April Discover Magazine--Missing URLs?
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: Jumby
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: PD
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Constants
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Constants
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Constants
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Constants
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy (updated 12 Mar 2006)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: PD
• Re: benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• benzene ring of tetrahedrons GIF
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity 24: The Sphere At Infinity ("Antisphere") vs The Sphere at 0
  • From: Jumby
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Greg Neill
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Gol
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: RP
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Something more stupid the General Relativity
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: rummij
• Re: Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: the new looks of dedanoe's site
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: John Christiansen
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: the new looks of dedanoe's site
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• the new looks of dedanoe's site
  • From: dedanoe
• Experiments debunk 'pseudogap' role in superconductivity
  • From: technology_post
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 24: The Sphere At Infinity ("Antisphere") vs The Sphere at 0
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity 24: The Sphere At Infinity ("Antisphere") vs The Sphere at 0
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: hanson
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• time bandwidth product
  • From: sonny746
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: RP
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: manny
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Cosmic Triumph: Satellite confirms birth theory of universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• New direction for cosmic radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Space probe backs up dark view of the Universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Jumby
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Jewish avarice vs. Buddhist benevolence
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Everyone watching Dr Who?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: NASA announces discovery of water on saturns moon.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: President Bush, doesn't care about America, Bird Flu
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Space probe backs up dark view of the Universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: mmeron
• A New Triumph for Inflation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: PD
• Re: Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Prash
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Space probe backs up dark view of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: President Bush, doesn't care about America, Bird Flu
  • From: Hero
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help a science teacher
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Need software for plotting spectroscopic data
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
  • From: T Wake
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 769 March 17, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Help a science teacher
  • From: laocmo
• A classical explanation for how electrons share in the CH4 molecule.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Non Parallel Plate Capacitance ?
  • From: prashanthramu
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Need software for plotting spectroscopic data
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: President Bush, doesn't care about America, Bird Flu
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: President Bush, doesn't care about America, Bird Flu
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Space probe backs up dark view of the Universe
  • From: tomgee
• Re: President Bush, doesn't care about America, Bird Flu
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• Need NASA's Grant Web Page
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: energy-efficient Pyramid house
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: energy-efficient Pyramid house
  • From: PD
• Need software for plotting spectroscopic data
  • From: Eric
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: Zodness
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Centripetal force, action and reaction, motorcycles
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Centripetal force, action and reaction, motorcycles
  • From: archon
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: uri
• Space probe backs up dark view of the Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: Hurricane intensity linked to warmer oceans
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• energy-efficient Pyramid house
  • From: brybolt
• calculation software for technology
  • From: brybolt
• particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
  • From: quantum stuff
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• "Corrections to Special Relativity"
  • From: Gol
• Re: Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Mental Aid to Comprehend GR (pls share yours)
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: manny
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Quantum Gravity 23 (abbreviated from Quantum Gravity...): Baez vs Doctorow
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: M82: Galaxy on Fire! NASA's Spitzer Reveals Stellar Smoke
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Undergraduate Physics Course Coverage
  • From: ABarlow
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: RadicalLibertarian
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: M82: Galaxy on Fire! NASA's Spitzer Reveals Stellar Smoke
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: M82: Galaxy on Fire! NASA's Spitzer Reveals Stellar Smoke
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: M82: Galaxy on Fire! NASA's Spitzer Reveals Stellar Smoke
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: manny
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: mmeron
• CH4 animation up and running- please look!
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Mental Aid to Comprehend GR (pls share yours)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Big Bang Afterglow Points to Inflation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Mental Aid to Comprehend GR (pls share yours)
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: It's Einstein's Day
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Creating a nuke wihtout radioactive material.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• The philosophy and metapysics of time- red vrs blue
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Savants & a Nobel Prize
  • From: manny
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: It's Einstein's Day
  • From: SCW
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Perry Marshall Toppled With One Word
  • From: platopes
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Space-time is too hot.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: uri
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Undergraduate Physics Course Coverage
  • From: srp
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: solletica
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• This is why :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP:http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060316_wmap_results...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A Unified View Of Correlations, Relativity, Clifford Algebra And Quantum Theory
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060316_wmap_results...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Hurricane intensity linked to warmer oceans
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Brazil Nut Effect
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• WMAP: http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060316_wmap_results.html
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Weird CD Spectra?.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Undergraduate Physics Course Coverage
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Billy
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Gol
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Projector polarization
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: AshishSaxe
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: srp
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) 21: How Fermat Discovered Coded Infinity in Quadrics and Conics
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: Bill
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Bill 2
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Whereabouts of initial anti-matter
  • From: joshipura
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Halm
• Re: Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: Halm
• Re: Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: Halm
• Re: Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Question about LC circuits and magnetic pendulums
  • From: solletica
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Zodness
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Undergraduate Physics Course Coverage
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) 21: How Fermat Discovered Coded Infinity in Quadrics and Conics
  • From: Zodness
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Zodness
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Does heat have mass?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Undergraduate Physics Course Coverage
  • From: freshman
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Bird Feathers and a Baseball
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Brazil Nut Effect
  • From: uri
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Brazil Nut Effect
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Brazil Nut Effect
  • From: tj Frazir
• Brazil Nut Effect
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Projector polarization
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Einstein Effect Reveals Icy Exoplanet
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Bill 2
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Bill 2
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Kilgore Trout
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Undergraduate Physics Course Coverage
  • From: Bill 2
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Does heat have mass?
  • From: Bill 2
• Re: John Barrow has won this year's Templeton Prize
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Absence
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Origin of p and q in H(q,p)?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: John Barrow has won this year's Templeton Prize
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• John Barrow has won this year's Templeton Prize
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Bosons form quantum threesome
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Projector polarization
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Unified View Of Correlations, Relativity, Clifford Algebra And Quantum Theory
  • From: Igor
• Re: lay question, pls answer
  • From: srp
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Igor
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A Unified View Of Correlations, Relativity, Clifford Algebra And Quantum Theory
  • From: mmeron
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
  • From: Bill
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: PD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Randy Poe
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Gol
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: MIT Profs Face Off on Latkes Versus Hamantaschen
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: uri
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: A Unified View Of Correlations, Relativity, Clifford Algebra And Quantum Theory
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Origin of p and q in H(q,p)?
  • From: Pavel Pokorny
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release coming1 16 Mar 2006
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: uri
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: G. L. Bradford
• Re: 2 Short questions on speed on sound in relation to temprature - NEWBIE()!!
  • From: CWatters
• 2 Short questions on speed on sound in relation to temprature - NEWBIE()!!
  • From: shamilton72
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Einstein Effect Reveals Icy Exoplanet
  • From: Sam Wormley
• MIT Profs Face Off on Latkes Versus Hamantaschen
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release coming1 16 Mar 2006
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release coming1 16 Mar 2006
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release coming1 16 Mar 2006
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: WMAP Second Data Release coming1 16 Mar 2006
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• A Unified View Of Correlations, Relativity, Clifford Algebra And Quantum Theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Edward Green
• WMAP Second Data Release coming1 16 Mar 2006
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 20: Unit Ball in Functional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) 21: How Fermat Discovered Coded Infinity in Quadrics and Conics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) 21: How Fermat Discovered Coded Infinity in Quadrics and Conics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: uri
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: uri
• Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: uri
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Absence
  • From: Cam Jones
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: onespiritedgal93
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: Mike
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: lay question, pls answer
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: uri
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• The speed of light can not be physically constant to all
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: lay question, pls answer
  • From: uri
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Re: lay question, pls answer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Parallel universes
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: lay question, pls answer
  • From: T Wake
• lay question, pls answer
  • From: john
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: uri
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: uri
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Haven't you ever heard of quantum black holes ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: expansion of ice
  • From: Zodness
• Absence
  • From: virtualadepts
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: uri
• Re: FFT and DFT
  • From: stevenj
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 20: Unit Ball in Functional Analysis
  • From: Zodness
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 20: Unit Ball in Functional Analysis
  • From: Zodness
• Re: FFT and DFT
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• resistance propotionell to the square of the velecito
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: resistance propotionell to the square of the velecito
  • From: Randy Poe
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Gol
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Parallel universes
  • From: Johan
• resistance propotionell to the square of the velecito
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• optimization
  • From: chrismgp
• Re: Gravitomagnetic field produced in a lab
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 20: Unit Ball in Functional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 20: Unit Ball in Functional Analysis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: FFT and DFT
  • From: stevenj
• Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon
  • From: Robert . Ford
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• The only people I like.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Lightnings increase rain.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• spectrometer uncertainty and intergration time
  • From: Carlos Romero
• Re: Lightnings increase rain.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Haven't you ever heard of quantum black holes ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Haven't you ever heard of quantum black holes ?
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: Lightnings increase rain.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules U PAY JUST $5 TO RECEIVE $15000 WITH PAYPAL!I TESTED IT I RESPECTED AL IT WORKS.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules 2 WAYS TO WIN YOUR MONEY WITH PAYPAL!IREAD IT!ITS FANTASTIC.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules ZzZ__ZzZ__ZzZ GIVE 5$ TO RECEIVE 15000$!EASY FAST 100% LEGAL AND REAL.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules Wow!GIVE 5$ TO RECEIVE 15000$ 100% EASY FAST LEGAL HONEST REAL!.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules win so many $ with paypal easily!it works perfectly!Just be honest and choose bestb way.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules PAYPAL MAGIC!WIN Eine Menge GELD MIT PAYPAL.doc (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules MAGIA GANA MUCHO DINERO CON PAYPAL FACILMENTE.doc (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules Gain much money with paypal its not a swindle it work really and its 100% legal its very easy read it.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules !!!!!GIVE ONLY A 5$ TO WIN A 15000$!!!!!ITS EASY!!!!!!ENJOY!!!!!.TXT (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Money Paypal english.doc (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Paypal GAIN MUCH MONEY HONESTLY!But respect rules !!!!!!!!!!!!! TURN 5$ INTO 15000$ WITH PAYPAL!EASY!AMAZING!.txt (01/01)
  • From: thefirstlady
• Lightnings increase rain.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: Kilgore Trout
• Re: Quantum Gravity and God
  • From: uri
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: Yoel Lana-Renault
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Re: expansion of ice
  • From: tadchem
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon
  • From: tadchem
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• Why is the cochlea in our ears shaped like a spiral?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: String theory as quantum gravity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Need clarification of rms width definition
  • From: Halm
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Parallel universes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: FFT and DFT
  • From: Mike Fontenot
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: Need clarification of rms width definition
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Parallel universes
  • From: Johan
• Need clarification of rms width definition
  • From: sonny746
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: expansion of ice
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Gravitomagnetic field produced in a lab
  • From: CWatters
• The next time someone asks...
  • From: platopes
• Re: foto site
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Christian Fundamentalism vs. Islamic Fundamentalism
  • From: Roy L . Fuchs
• Re: expansion of ice
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: It's cut and dried, I will win.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: evaporation rate of water
  • From: Donalbane
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• The Best Defense Is Gene Nonsense
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "Gravity"
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 19: Infinitesimal Rotations and Identity Matrix
  • From: Zodness
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 19: Infinitesimal Rotations and Identity Matrix
  • From: Zodness
• "Gravity"
  • From: Gol
• FFT and DFT
  • From: laguiche2004
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GRAVITY IS NOT A FORCE
  • From: uri
• benzene ring
  • From: ma1ibu
• expansion of ice
  • From: will_usher
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• It's cut and dried, I will win.
  • From: Jeff…Relf
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: T Wake
• Note to the group, Bilge resets replies.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, March 13, 2006
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 19: Infinitesimal Rotations and Identity Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 18: QM Based on Generalized Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 19: Infinitesimal Rotations and Identity Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 18: QM Based on Generalized Eigenvalues
  • From: Zodness
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 18: QM Based on Generalized Eigenvalues
  • From: Zodness
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sliding Puck
  • From: impartially_insane
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Doing away with Space and Time
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: what really are Gravitons?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: what really are Gravitons?
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Bird Feathers and a Baseball
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Ostensible Definition
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Sliding Puck
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Sliding Puck
  • From: Loohan
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Old twin paradox
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: Old twin paradox
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: Old twin paradox
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: Sliding Puck
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Nottub
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: JR Gibberish
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• life-after-life
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 18: QM Based on Generalized Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 18: QM Based on Generalized Eigenvalues
  • From: OsherD
• Bird Feathers and a Baseball
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Sliding Puck
  • From: impartially_insane
• Sliding Puck
  • From: Loohan
• Sliding Puck
  • From: Loohan
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: JR Gibberish
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Record-breaking luminosity boosts discovery potential at Fermilab's Tevatron collider
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• An algorithm developed to process X-ray diffraction data also solves Sudoku puzzles.
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Advance Hastens Practicality Of Superconductors
  • From: Mike Jr.
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Is M6 isomorphic to our universe?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Quantum Mechanics of a vibrating string?
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Billy
• Re: Uncertainty principle, fourier transform
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: uri
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The ring gear...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Old twin paradox
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Mike
• Re: What about solar mirrors to reflect more sunlight onto earth ?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Old twin paradox
  • From: Eugeniusz
• Re: Old twin paradox
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• SOME QUESTIONS TO MEDITATE ON!:
  • From: NILS BÖRJESSON
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Energy conservation in moving frames
  • From: robert . w . adams
• Re: JR Gibberish
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Examples of Coincidence as Misleading Explanation
  • From: Hexenmeister
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Nottub
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Examples of Coincidence as Misleading Explanation
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Examples of Coincidence as Misleading Explanation
  • From: John Bailey
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: PD
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: PD
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: PD
• Re: The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: PD
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: oriel36
• Re: a storm is coming... in a few years
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Reality is much more fun.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 17.1: Stochastic/Markov Matrices, Jordan and Classical Canonical Forms
  • From: OsherD
• PlanetPhysics
  • From: FreePhysics
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 17.1: Stochastic/Markov Matrices, Jordan and Classical Canonical Forms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: I'd kill them first.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 17.1: Stochastic/Markov Matrices, Jordan and Classical Canonical Forms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: evaporation rate of water
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Reality is much more fun.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Reality is much more fun.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• GR is high tech, buddy, all the way.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Duckie no f_ckie.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Duckie no f_ckie.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: I'm going to appeal my eviction come Monday.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the meaning of life
  • From: donstockbauer
• I'm going to appeal my eviction come Monday.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• Re: I'd kill them first.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• light-driven nano-scale motor
  • From: Sam Wormley
• I'd kill them first.
  • From: Jeff_Яelf
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 March 2006 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: infinite universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: John Baez
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 17: Stochastic/Markov Matrices, Jordan and Classical Canonical Forms
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gravity
  • From: Miller
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: PD
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Mar 06 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: Kilgore Trout
• evaporation rate of water
  • From: Donalbane
• evaporation rate of water
  • From: Donalbane
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: Kilgore Trout
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: oriel36
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How heavier atoms be built from hydrogen atom or deuterium?
  • From: newedana
• The ring gear and planetary gear having fun running around
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: oriel36
• Re: sorry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Troolean operators
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• How to build a nuclear bomb without radioactive material.
  • From: reactor1967
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Mike
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Mike
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: T Wake
• Re: newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• sorry
  • From: S J Mcpherson
• Re: First Atom
  • From: T Wake
• newbies thought on physics(pick on me and I'll sulk and never come here again)
  • From: S J Mcpherson
• Re: Examples of Coincidence as Misleading Explanation
  • From: PD
• Re: Lasers are _Very_ cold.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Q: recomendations for a textbook re fluid drag
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Mike
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: In quantum physics breakthrough, strange computer is on and off
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• In quantum physics breakthrough, strange computer is on and off
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: QCD Apprentice
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of
  • From: Nottub
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Mike
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Mike
• Re: Square and cube seconds as units on their own
  • From: Narasimham
• Re: Square and cube seconds as units on their own
  • From: Narasimham
• Examples of Coincidence as Misleading Explanation
  • From: Rich Sondheim
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 768 March 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Lasers are _Very_ cold.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Can Branes exist without strings??
  • From: quantis
• Re: First Atom
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ball on string - moving center
  • From: Mark
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How to calculate hardness
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The oldest explosion in the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Animation of molecular orbital. First ever. Enjoy.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: First Atom
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Journey through center of the earth
  • From: uri
• Re: Fermions
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: String theory as quantum gravity
  • From: inquirydog
• Re: ball on string - moving center
  • From: Mark
• Re: Article: Evidence for bubble fusion called into question
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Journey through center of the earth
  • From: Halm
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Journey through center of the earth
  • From: uri
• Re: Journey through center of the earth
  • From: Halm
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: potential energy
  • From: Dave Lister
• Re: First Atom
  • From: platopes
• Re: Journey through center of the earth
  • From: uri
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: SCW
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: potential energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: PD
• Re: String theory as quantum gravity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: First Atom
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: vze2vt56
• Re: Journey through center of the earth
  • From: Halm
• Re: Lasers are _Very_ cold.
  • From: T Wake
• Spin Model Versus Sign Model
  • From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: srp
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: vze2vt56
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 768 March 9, 2006 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: First Atom
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: SCW
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: SCW
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: vze2vt56
• On the Origin of Symmetry
  • From: Daryl
• Advantage of molecular orbitals.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Spaceman
• Wormholes
  • From: w . m . derapper
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Journey through center of the earth
  • From: gilliland . guy
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: ball on string - moving center
  • From: PD
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Mike
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Nottub
• Quantum mechanics of a vibrating string?
  • From: Rick Evans
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: First Atom
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: First Atom
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: First Atom
  • From: Mark
• Gravitons & GR
  • From: quantis
• ball on string - moving center
  • From: Mark
• Re: First Atom
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: SCW
• First Atom
  • From: Diana
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: Black Holes and Gravitational Fields
  • From: Mac D.
• Re: potential energy
  • From: Mac D.
• Re: potential energy
  • From: Mac D.
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Complex Normal Distribution may be the unifying domain.
  • From: Akira Bergman
• potential energy
  • From: Michael Lodman
• Re: Black Holes and Gravitational Fields
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 16: Eigenvalues and the I Matrix
  • From: dd
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 16: Eigenvalues and the I Matrix
  • From: dd
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 16: Eigenvalues and the I Matrix
  • From: dd
• Re: Why can't you see a black hole?
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Black Holes and Gravitational Fields
  • From: skeptic
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Rock Brentwood
• Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
  • From: Lynette
• Re: Fermions
  • From: boson boss
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: the meaning of life
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: srp
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Hexenmeister
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Where does the spring force come from?
  • From: vze2vt56
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: quantis
• Fermions
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: GeordieSi
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Mike
• Re: trombone and physics
  • From: judamd
• Re: How to turn your microwave into a nuclear weapon
  • From: rick_sobie
• Re: Article: Evidence for bubble fusion called into question
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Article: Evidence for bubble fusion called into question
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: PD
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: String Theory Without String Theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Epiphany on molecular orbitals.
  • From: ma1ibu
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Epiphany on molecular orbitals.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Galactic Core Black Holes
  • From: Michael J. Strickland
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: PD
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: PD
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: RP
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Epiphany on molecular orbitals.
  • From: PD
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: srp
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: PD
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: BD
• Re: Double slit experiment confusion
  • From: GeordieSi
• Re: A new theory with two postulates
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Did Einstein Know Speed of Light Was Variable?
  • From: SCW
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Igor
• A new theory with two postulates
  • From: SCW
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: BD
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: platopes
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: BD
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 16: Eigenvalues and the I Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 16: Eigenvalues and the I Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: rotation of galaxies
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Greatest Unattempted Experiment
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 16: Eigenvalues and the I Matrix
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why can't you see a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: the meaning of life
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Spaceman
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
  • From: tj Frazir
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Nottub
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Mike
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Humor 2: Could Gravitation Be Expansive/Repulsive?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Did Einstein Know Speed of Light Was Variable?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Teaching physics to biology students
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: String Theory Without String Theory
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: String Theory Without String Theory
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Which is louder?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why can't you see a black hole?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: bar magnets
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Calculating KE of a rotating square
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Why can't you see a black hole?
  • From: Henning Makholm
• Re: Why can't you see a black hole?
  • From: mike3
• Humor 2: Could Gravitation Be Expansive/Repulsive?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why can't you see a black hole?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why can't you see a black hole?