Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:00:11 GMT
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:32:53 -0500, tj Frazir wrote:
Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???BUSTED
Group: sci.physics Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2006, 12:30pm From:
GravityPhysics@xxxxxxxxx (tj Frazir)
Your all still busted.
1 each atomis putting a force on the next atom.
2..each atom moves its self . Orbital changes in each atom moves
the center of mass from the center of gravityand the distance from the
center of the mass to the center of the gravity is F.
BUSTED FOR THIS REASON ::::::::::::::::::::::: I said the
rod is 1 light year long.
[rest snipped]
1 light year is about 9.46 * 10^15 meters, and would be readily
observable (and, if here on Earth, impossible to store without it
sticking out somewhere). Where, precisely, is this rod of yours, Mister
Billionaire, and how thick is it?
A 10 cm diameter rod made of iron would weigh 7874 kg/m^3 * (Pi*0.05^2) *
9.46*10^15 = 5.85 * 10^14 metric tonnes.
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- Next by Date: Re: Teaching physics to biology students
- Previous by thread: Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
- Next by thread: Re: Is length contraction of a rod real or perpective???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
