Re: A new theory with two postulates
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Mar 2006 11:47:34 -0800
SCW wrote:
Here's an opening gambit. I have made two assumptions
1) No theory is infallible.
2) The demise of any theory is close at hand when additional theory is
required to support it against agreed weaknesses.
Any thoughts or comments?
Your theory has the logical consistancy of "this sentence is false".
.
SCW
.
- References:
- A new theory with two postulates
- From: SCW
- A new theory with two postulates
- Prev by Date: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Next by Date: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Previous by thread: Re: A new theory with two postulates
- Next by thread: Re: A new theory with two postulates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
