Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry


Spaceman wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141861661.037872.97070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Spaceman wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141860597.737598.48850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Spaceman wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141847067.493774.246440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Spaceman wrote:

[snip]

Face it, space***. You cannot understand. Every topic in math is
completely and utterly beyond your comprehension - you prove it time
and again.

Dear Eric the mathematical wizard,
You can not even figure out that transforms are simple mathematical
tricks to limit the outcome.
You are one of the smartest-stupid math morons there are.
You say you know math yet you can't see what the math does
when it tricks you.
LOL

Why do you need to use a transform to add velocities Eric?
Why do you need to use such to prove lightspeed is constant
to all observers?
LOL

You laugh at what you have no hope of understanding. Whatever it takes
for you to come to terms with your inability, I suppose.

I laugh at what I understand actually and I understand you are clueless
about the "trick" of math you fall for when you use a "transform"
and if you really know math, you should see such a "trick" easily.
Of course, you don't..
LOL

No, space***. You do not understand.

You *** around for a half dozen posts about the simple question of the
straightest line on the surface of a sphere without actually answering
the question.

Dear Eric,
Listen you freakin spacetime warped , reality challenged, bag of mostly
water
that is lacking a logical functioning system in your brain.
The shortest distance between two points is not on the damn surface
of a sphere you moronic dip***, and it will never be such either.

Yes, it is. No matter how many times you stamp your feet and protest,
the fact of the matter is that a geodesic describes the shortest path
on a curved surface. Going "through" the surface is not allowed, and
the fact that you cannot give an answer without cheating says a lot
about your ability to think abstractly.


It is through it, you stupid rubber ruler worshipping dingbat.
How freakin stupid are you to think that is not the fact?
You truly need to fix your brain.
It is broken.
then again. maybe because it is broken, you can not realize such.
LOL

YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND.

That is as simple as that. I cannot fathom the hilarity that would
ensue if you were in my geometry class today, where we covered
spherical geometry specifically.




You do this every time someone tries to ask you a question, you
wriggle, fuss, and do everything BUT answer the question.

For example: What is the dot product of the vector i + j and the vector
j + k.

Who gives a ***.

Since you know no math, the answer would be lost upon you.

What the hell does that have to do with what we are talking about?

Absolutely nothing. I am just making a point.

We are talking about the shortest distance between two points on a sphere.

Which you cannot understand in the abstract.

Shove your math problem back up the ass it came from, your mouth.
The shortest distance is not on the sphere and me answering that math
question
correctly or incorrectly would not change that fact you straight line
challenged
dork.

A geodesic is a straight line. I challenge you to find a shorter path
between two points on a sphere. Note: I said ON, fuckwit.


Stick your "I am smarter than you because I can play with pencil and paper
and mathematics more than you can" attitude back into the ass you pulled
your head out of to post here.

You started it by declaring you know more than everyone else about
every fucking topic.

If you can't handle it, go away like a good little space***.

Rather than writing that little whiny rant, you could have simply said
"the answer is 1". I suppose you find it much easier to be a moron
than actually solve a math problem.

You have absolutely no place on this group, space***. You are
FUNDAMENTALLY incapable of understanding the underlying tools of
physics. Your explanations are at best childish, and at worst outright
wrong. You have no unique insight - a moron's insight is not unique, if
this group is any indication.


--
James M Driscoll Jr
Spaceman

.

Loading