Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 9 Mar 2006 12:05:28 -0800
Spaceman wrote:
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1141871439.108003.84030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, it is. No matter how many times you stamp your feet and protest,
the fact of the matter is that a geodesic describes the shortest path
on a curved surface. Going "through" the surface is not allowed, and
the fact that you cannot give an answer without cheating says a lot
about your ability to think abstractly.
Through the surface is allowed.
You lose and you are a moron that has completely warped his brain
to beyond repair.
See?
You are incapable of thinking abstractly. You are also incredibly
arrogant about it - you cannot even solve a simple vector equation. You
place yourself over all mathematics ever made even though you lack the
mental ability to even understand why the mathematics have been created
and what they are used for.
It is ok though, the damage is limited to you and your immediate
family. If intelligence skips a generation, I'm sure your children will
succeed despite you. If your entire family tree is stupid, well - no
matter, nothing to be done.
Enjoy your ignorance.
[snip moron-speak]
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- References:
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Prev by Date: Re: Where does the spring force come from?
- Next by Date: Re: A new theory with two postulates
- Previous by thread: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Next by thread: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading