Re: A new theory with two postulates


QCD Apprentice wrote:

SCW wrote:
Mike wrote:


SCW wrote:

Here's an opening gambit. I have made two assumptions

1) No theory is infallible.

2) The demise of any theory is close at hand when additional theory is
required to support it against agreed weaknesses.

Any thoughts or comments?

Of course. According to your postulates, your theory is also falllible.

Mike




.

SCW


Well, there isn't much theory there to be honest, but yes, that's true
- it could be replace by a better theory.

It's more a jibe at SR, which seems to be painting itself into a
corner.

SCW

How is SR painting itself into a corner?
It's fairly well accepted that it works as a good approximation when
there's no gravity, and GR only works on large scales.

OK, explain to me how you would resolve the twins paradox with out
bolting on theory developed after the 1905 paper.

SCW

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A new theory with two postulates
    ... The demise of any theory is close at hand when additional theory is ... required to support it against agreed weaknesses. ... How is SR painting itself into a corner? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: subclass static control ss_bitmap type paint
    ... You need to have BeginPaint and EndPaint around. ... HDC hDC = BeginPaint; ... BeginPaint function to prepare for painting. ... Microsoft Online Community Support ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ui)
  • Re: Graphics VB2008 Pro
    ... Have you tried to use the WPF approach for the painting? ... Microsoft Online Community Support ... where an initial response from the community or a Microsoft Support ... project analysis and dump analysis issues. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)