Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry


"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142018526.833057.148760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Spaceman wrote:

[snip man-child babble]

You are an adult. Talk like one.


The fact that you are fighting a very valid and useful geometry just
shows me that you have no interest in understanding math and how it
applies to this world.

I am not "fighting" it.
I am pointing out that there is a shorter distance than your shorter
path.
and there are no rules that you have to follow spherical geometry in the
universe.

You are MISSING THE POINT. Try broadening your horizons and stop acting
like a fucking inbred moron.

LOL
You are missing the point I am making and merely making
yourself look even more like the smartest stupid person there
can be.


The most obvious use of spherical geometry is plotting paths for
aircraft. What is the most fuel-efficient route between two cities?
Sure, you can say "a tunnel through the ground" and you will be
rightfully called an idiot. Airplanes have to travel on what is
approximately a sphere, so the most fuel-efficient course is the one
that has the smallest travel time.

Are you really as dense as yu are showing here?
I have not stated that the geodesic is not the shortest path.
How dense are you to not even read what I have stated.
I merely stated the shortest distance is never a geodesic
in reality.
You are a total abstract moron that only keeps proving you can
not even read anymore.


On a non-Euclidian surface/space, the shortest path between two points
is called a geodesic. On a sphere, examples of those lines are the
lines of longitude and latitude.

Your truly are a moron huh?
The shortest distance is not on the dang surface you freakin retard.
the shortest path is.. If you had a brain that could actually think
of more than just the spheres surface only you could grasp at a clue
as to your stupidity when you argue against such a reality.



You are AGAIN missing the point.

You arew the dense piece of dried cow dung that is missing
the point I ma making.
The shortest path (a geodesic on a sphere) is not the shortest
ditance between the two points in reality.
Stay a moron all you want.
I am not missing your point, I am actually trying to show
you my point and I understand you point fine.
You are the moron that does not understand the reality
of the shortest distance is shorter than the shortest path
on a spheres surface.
Sheesh
You are a completely ignorant stupid smart person!
LOL


.

Loading