Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: "Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:52:27 -0500
"oriel36" <geraldkelleher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142026490.326047.57990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I like the 1898 science fiction novel as much as anyone else where they
combine space and time for the 'Time Machine' -
" 'Scientific people,' proceeded the Time Traveller, after the
pause required for the proper assimilation of this, 'know very well
that Time is only a kind of Space."
http://www.bartleby.com/1000/1.html
But I sure as hell would not want to spend a billion dollars trying to
prove if that science fiction novel was right -
" Question 42 ; What does the word 'spacetime' mean?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It means that in our universe, 3-dimensional space and time form a
single indivisible new physical object which has 4 dimensions. All
physical laws and phenomena seem to require thinking about space and
time as this blended object. That's what Einstein's relativity theories
were all about. "
http://einstein.stanford.edu/
If you can tell the difference between the science fiction novel and
the Nasa/Stanford version then you are a better man than I am. Maybe
the U.S. gov will give you a billion dollars to prove that the science
fiction novel 'Journey to the center of the Earth' should be proven as
a fact !!.
http://www.classicscentral.com/pic9/ci138c.jpg
The biggest problem I see is that for all observers to mathematically
measure lightspeed to all observers relativity needs a silly little trick
math
called a transform and a transform is simply a trick that limits the
outcome of the math.
Why these "smart mathematics people" can not see the self limiting
tricks of things like velocity addition is beyond me.
I can see it and I am not the greatest in math I admit.
Lets have fun with c=1 using the velocity addition "transform".
w = (u + v)/(1 + uv/c^2)
and I use..
u = c and v = c
and c = 1
you end up with
w = (1 + 1)/(1+ 1/1)
then
w = 2/{1 + 1)
w = 2/2
w=1
self limiting bull*** is all it is.
and yet the smartest people are "fooled" by it.
:)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: oriel36
- Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- References:
- Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: oriel36
- Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: Spaceman
- Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- From: oriel36
- Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- Prev by Date: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Next by Date: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Mar 06 Washington, DC
- Previous by thread: Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- Next by thread: Re: Jack Sarfatti publicly crashes and burns
- Index(es):