Re: Troolean operators
- From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 11 Mar 2006 10:58:58 -0800
"Well when you get out there, in space, be sure that your flaps are not
on too
steep an angle, you don't want friction to burn them when they are
turned
towards the sun"
So, OK, there is no atmosphere in space, flaps need air pressure to
work,
yet would the sun cause them a problem, and would that problem
surface, when you are back on earth, trying to land?
If the person was a known liar who told you that, you would be worried
because
number one, it sounds serious, yet has components which may not make
sense.
So it may be a true statement, it may be a false statement, and it may
be pure
nonsense.
Lets take it a bit further.
So you say, well either what he said was true, or what he said was
false.
Granted, so what is the result?
Undefined.
Maybe parts of what he said we true and parts were false, but the whole
thing sounds like bs, and you have to make a decision.
So you see, if you stop there, you might crash. So using troolean
logic,
you would expect the unexpected, and in this case get a second opinion
and if everyone is just making stuff up?
So you still need to assume, that it may be true, it may be false,
and if something happens that is not what you might expect then
you have a plan c.
And that is where a whole lot of problems occur. Right there in plan b.
Because you assume a thing is either true or false, so you have a plan
b.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Troolean operators
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Troolean operators
- References:
- Troolean operators
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Troolean operators
- From: Kilgore Trout
- Re: Troolean operators
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: Troolean operators
- From: rick_sobie
- Troolean operators
- Prev by Date: Re: Troolean operators
- Next by Date: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Previous by thread: Re: Troolean operators
- Next by thread: Re: Troolean operators
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|