Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry


"T Wake" <taswakeAT@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:n4udnYRoOILzzY7ZRVnyhA@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On Saturday 11 March 2006 22:30, Spaceman decided it was time and wrote in
sci.physics (<Bd-dnZbsQbIL0o7ZnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>):


"T Wake" <taswakeAT@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g_SdnSNCF5tk0I7ZRVnyrg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<snipped complete waste of time>

I assume you snipped everything you didn't understand. It is OK though, as
I
am happy to remind you of your evasive tactics each time you start a new
crackpot thread.

You assume wrong just as you always do.
I choose not to waste time with your overbloated ignorance.


Where can the centre be, when nothing is "moving" in the same direction
as anything else?

Where do you get such bull*** from?

You truly have no idea about cosmological data. As soon as you can point
to
a set of large scale objects moving in the same direction we can talk
more.

LOL
At one point in time every year,
The Earth and the Sun are moving through space in the same direction..
You lose!
bubble bursted!
burned by the Sun and Earth simultaneously.
ROFLOL
:)




.

Quantcast