Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Timo Nieminen <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:01:48 +1000
On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Hexenmeister wrote:
"Timo Nieminen" <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Don't bother making it more complicated by having a series of pulses, and
| acceleration. Just stick to a single pulse, from a spaceship moving at
| constant velocity towards the detector.
LOL! Doppler shift with a single cycle.
"Single pulse", not "single-cycle pulse". There is a difference.
Btw, you posted earlier asking about Lorentz transformations for velocity in an arbitrary direction. I posted a derivation of the homogeneous Lorentz transformations for arbitrary relative velocity and orientation of the two coordinate systems.
You did reply to that post, but without comment on the derivation. Since you've repeated your original request about Lorentz transformations for velocity in an arbitrary direction, perhaps you didn't understand it. Do you want to go over the derivation I provided in steps so I can explain it to you?
--
Timo
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- References:
- Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: robert . w . adams
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Hexenmeister
- Energy conservation in moving frames
- Prev by Date: Re: Euclids postulates and non-Euclidean geometry
- Next by Date: Re: Troolean operators
- Previous by thread: Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- Next by thread: Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|