Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: "Hexenmeister" <vanquish@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:08:48 GMT
"Timo Nieminen" <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20060312095712.F70045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Hexenmeister wrote:
|
| > "Timo Nieminen" <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| > | Don't bother making it more complicated by having a series of pulses,
and
| > | acceleration. Just stick to a single pulse, from a spaceship moving at
| > | constant velocity towards the detector.
| >
| > LOL! Doppler shift with a single cycle.
|
| "Single pulse", not "single-cycle pulse". There is a difference.
Idiot:
http://www.falstad.com/fourier/
Oh, you snipped.
Refusal to discuss physics noted.
"Timo Nieminen" <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:20060312055535.L70045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Don't bother making it more complicated by having a series of pulses, and
| acceleration. Just stick to a single pulse, from a spaceship moving at
| constant velocity towards the detector.
LOL! Doppler shift with a single cycle.
Here, debug this single pulse.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Doppler/Doppler.htm
Do you know have any idea how stupid you are, Nieminen?
Androcles.
.
- References:
- Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: robert . w . adams
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Hexenmeister
- Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Energy conservation in moving frames
- Prev by Date: life-after-life
- Next by Date: Re: JR Gibberish
- Previous by thread: Re: Energy conservation in moving frames
- Next by thread: SOME QUESTIONS TO MEDITATE ON!:
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|