Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second

Sam Wormley wrote:
New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
http://www.physorg.com/news11837.html

Scientists peering back to the oldest light in the universe have new
evidence to support the concept of inflation. The concept poses the
universe expanded many trillion times its size in less than a
trillionth of a second at the outset of the big bang.

It would be helpful if the scientists could tell us how we got here 12
billion years before the light from the early explosion did.

If they are saying that space-time expanded, hence the red shift, then
what is space-time that it could expand? This is easily interpreted as
evidence for the existence of Aether! Of course, if the Aether exists,
then SR is wrong. But the Big Bang is predicated on GR, which
supposedly arose from SR. So we end up with the paradox that if the
Big Bang theory is right, then the Big Bang theory is wrong.

Scientists spew information as though everything they say is fully
consistent with everything else modern science says. When solid data
arises, we are led to believe that the theories are proved correct.
This is also far from the truth. Data is fact, theory is merely an
interpretation. I would be more impressed if they would share the
actual data of their experiments and allow the science community at
large to judge for ourselves what the data means.

Dave

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Will Somebody PleaseTell bz What an Inertial Frame is.
    ... > There are a lot of scientists that would disagree with you. ... Red shift is NOT evidence of an expanding universe, ... > for photons of different speeds. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Stop It!!
    ... scientists and other humans are too selfish to exclude themselves from anywhere. ... Where does this evidence come from if the hypothesis hasn't been ... That, in the absence of humans, wildlife would ... ... > .differing levels of disturbance with equivalent natural habitats to ...
    (sci.bio.ecology)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... "spark of life" which separates living from non-living things. ... It's only a blurred line to scientists who keep changing the ... alone supported your calculations in any way with evidence. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Honest Creationists Argument wanted
    ... "spark of life" which separates living from non-living things. ... It's only a blurred line to scientists who keep changing the ... alone supported your calculations in any way with evidence. ... how could the first DNA replication system come about if not by ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Interesting article about DNA evidence (or lack thereof)
    ... scientists have made that claim. ... the evidence for human evolution; ... I guess it depends on what you mean by "faith." ... "The spirit told me Evolution is false!" ...
    (soc.religion.mormon)
Loading