Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- From: "T Wake" <taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:14:01 -0000
"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:LNadnUOIuLKrpYHZRVn-vw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"John Christiansen" <superkaempe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:441bee2f$0$11698$ba624c82@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are you sure he is a real person? If he is he must be a Troll since I
find it impossible for a person to be that stupid and still being able to
write understandable English. If there was a law against stupidity more
than 99% of Spaceman's posts would be violating such a law.
So John,
You think I am wrong when I state stuff like 1c + 0.5c = 1.5c?
You think I am wrong about speeds being relative and not constant
to all observers?
Sadly you aren't even consistent about it. You only allow the speed addition
in your new "postulate" to apply to the observer, and even then only when
the observer knows what the original signal details should have been.
Not to mention, when you look at the actual mechanics the example you used
didn't work as you hoped - which, interestingly, is why you decided to obey
Androcles and no longer respond to my questions.
If you had any faith in your postulate then you would have been able to
defend it.
.
- References:
- Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- From: T Wake
- Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- From: Martin Hogbin
- Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- From: T Wake
- Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- From: John Christiansen
- Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- From: Spaceman
- Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- Prev by Date: Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- Next by Date: A new magetic phenomenon that will improve RAMs and increase computer hard drive capacity
- Previous by thread: Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- Next by thread: Re: Spaceman - Quantum Mechanics
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|