So_Called randomness is naught but unknowns, I posit.
- From: Jeff…Relf <Me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Mar 2006 06:11:08 GMT
Hi quantum_stuff, Say I toss a pair of fair and balanced dice.
What will the number be ? Snake eyes ? A 3 and a 2 ? A 2 and a 3 ?
You don't know... it's probabilistic.
But _Unknowns_ are the _Only_ reason it's probabilistic.
So_Called randomness is naught but unknowns, I posit.
Same goes for the position and density of a photon,
they are simply unknown or unknowable given _Current_ theory/technology.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
- From: quantum stuff
- particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
- Prev by Date: Re: WMAP: New Satellite Data On Universe's First Trillionth Second
- Next by Date: Re: Gravity and dreams.
- Previous by thread: Re: particle is always particle or ghostly superposition?
- Next by thread: Re: So_Called randomness is naught but unknowns, I posit.
- Index(es):