Re: New direction for cosmic radiation


"jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx" <jgreen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1142895534.046991.56230@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Spaceman wrote:
"T Wake" <taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Kuudnato4PUunYLZnZ2dnUVZ8qSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx

"Spaceman" <Realspace@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:f5SdnSnPP9CHTYPZRVn-pA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:zaATf.39615$oL.122@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Spaceman wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_PzTf.39593$oL.14633@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Spaceman wrote:

"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dapTf.38581$oL.11252@xxxxxxxxxxxx


Spaceman wrote:


"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html


This webpage you post a link to is a bunch of crap.
The two different views of the expansion shown would be showing
two "big bangs" so therefore it is a terrible explanation that
does
not even fit the big bang theory itself.
Sheesh.

All that shows is you can't understand the diagrams. A and B are
two
of an infinite number of observing points in the universe. The
point
is that every observer sees the same thing--galaxies receding in
all
directions.


Sam,
Do you just ignore The opposite occuring with Andromeda and
the Milky Way?
That web page does ignore the Andromeda effect.
Do you actually think for yourself? Or do you look for
some sort of webpage that actually does the thinking for you
even if it is wrong?




All that shows is you can't understand the diagrams. A and B are
two
of an infinite number of observing points in the universe. The
point
is that every observer sees the same thing--galaxies receding in
all
directions.


Wrong as usual Sam.
What they are is incorrect versions of the universe.
There are galaxies heading towards each other.
It seems you like to ignore such a fact huh?



That's true locally, space***, but this thread is about cosmic
expansion on the cosmic scale.

No Center
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html

Your stupid weblink is saying it is local.
Read it ***.
It says Galaxies.
It is ignoring some galaxies apparently.
Sheesh


It is simply a poor choice of words. As I have tried to tell you
(repeatedly) there are problems with translating physical terms into
words, as occasionally there are misunderstandings with the phrases
chosen.

Sadly, your mathematical abilities are very limited so it seems
unlikely
that any formula would have a worth while meaning for you.

My mathematical abilities?
ROFLOL
You are one of the morons that think miles do not add
like basic algebra states they do.
LOL


As a side note, for my own interest, what you do take the term "galaxy"
to
mean?

Galaxy as in the entire Milky Way.
Galaxy as in Andromeda.
You are a moron as in Andromeda is not recessin from the Milky
Way.
It (the galaxy of Andormeda) is actually heading towards us
(the galaxy of The Milky Way).
Wake up some year Mr Wake.
Your recession has a pretty large problem.
about the size of two galaxies at least.
LOL

Funnier still; there are plenty of examples of galactic COLLISIONS,
and much of these interactions are claimed on complex galactic
structures.

Wormley thinks that if you (or someone else) looks into a curved mirror
(sic lense),
then because they LOOK taller/shorter, then they ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
He'll understand when hell freezes that what we "see" aint necessarily
so.

Yes,
They are sadly all stuck in the hall of mirrors and they have
been given rubber rulers, malfunctioning clocks, and a thing called
relativity that is treated more like a bible reading than a science.
:)


.

Loading