Re: Matter and antimatter



"srp" <srp2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:442A744F.5050701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Michael Lodman a icrit :
Sorry if this is a stupid question but my web searches have yielded no
results:

Lots of sources say that particles and antiparticles, such as positrons
and electrons, collide and annihilate each other. They don't ever say why
this is so.

Why does simply having the opposite charge in electrons and positrons
result in annihilation?

It is not only a matter of having opposite charges. The particles
have to be totally identical _except_ for charge to be antiparticles
of one another.

Electron/positron is such a case.

As to why this occurs, this is a good question. Actually it is the
fundamental question.

It is an _observed_ phenomenon, just like electron/positron pair
creation from photons of energy 1.022 MeV or higher (that was
predicted by Dirac), that remains to be fully explained.

Andri Michaud


I've often thought that the annihilation concept is unnecessary.
If an electron and positron converge on each other from infinity,
classically they reach the speed of light at about the proton diameter
separation. This provides half the annihilation energy.

If they converge still further and merge into a neutral particle or orbit
each other, they could easily reach/release the observed "annihilation"
energy.
The resulting particle or complex would be light and uncharged (similar to a
neutrino but heavier) and be non-interacting and hard to detect (like the
neutrino).



--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael J. Strickland
Quality Services qualityser@xxxxxxx
703-560-7380
---------------------------------------------------------------


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: experimental verification of electromagnetic mass
    ... a massless chargeless photon move charged particles? ... >of electrons and positrons that form the shell around the positron. ... That is approximately 2/3rds of the lepton charge has gone ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Matter and antimatter
    ... Lots of sources say that particles and antiparticles, such as positrons and electrons, collide and annihilate each other. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Could Dark Matter be here on earth?
    ... I'm pointing out that your argument of pointing out the observations that dark matter was invented to explain does not prove the existence of dark matter. ... Using a sensitive detector to survey the abundance of high-energy electrons and positrons in nearby reaches of space, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has found new evidence that may hint at the existence of dark matter, the exotic invisible material believed to make up 85 percent of the mass of the universe. ... The model suggests that when protons revved up to high energies by blast waves from exploded stars collide with other protons in interstellar space, the particles produce positrons. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The aether is made out of ordinary protons and electrons
    ... A better argument against aether dragging is stellar ... an aether particle and *between* aether particles. ... even protons bound in a nucleus are surrounded by aether ... > It is reasonable to make the assumption that electrons are more mobile ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: A Challenge to Orthodox Relativity
    ... a change in the spacing as well as size of the particles. ... "charge", or electric force, of charged particles underlying the ... precessional frequency and resulting magneto-striction. ... Coulomb force between the electrons and protons would increase and ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)