Re: We are, a mass extinction event.



One of the most obvious mistakes in the logic regarding our origins,
appears to be in the perspective taken, by the observers.
Those studying the subject.
They are not being objective.

They are approaching the subject, from the perspective of a designer,
and saying that they are merely observing, what nature has made, all
the while, acting like a designer, who would be designing these things
for instance on a computer.

So, then from the designers perspective, what is the difference, from
what we see, and mere conscious changes in design?

Are they not studying the mind, of the designer, rather than the facts
at hand?

Is it not equally plausible to say, that these changes were
modifications based on evolving ideas which popped into the heads of
some alien designers in some higher dimension above ours where we
cannot see them etc but they cn reach into a pond from a higher
dimension and effect things in our 3 or 4 dimensional world?

Of course it is.

They are studying the evolution of the ideas, and chasing these things
around looking to make pieces fit in a puzzle as if they were
investigating the mind of the ones who were creating these flora and
fauna.

They are not looking at the facts.

Because facts have a way of throwing a spanner into the works don't
they?

Facts like that tool workshop in Africa, where some peoples were
manufacturing stone axes and such and it stayed in business for over a
million years.

Facts like why bees escaped the KT event?

Why many species died in extinction events and others did not, even
those that existed side by side in nature.

And these are the ones in this scientific dogmatic audio book.

Look just a bit onto the Internet to find facts which do not jive with
any of that wildly held scientific world view.

http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/13anc03.htm

And you say well yes you can just debunk all that, they made it up, and
well it is not truly scientific investigation, and well you know, there
is so nmuch bs out there, that one pile looks just like the other pile
to me.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Losing my mind in Publisher 2003!
    ... childish insults before knowing all the facts. ... reply, I'm using publisher as a training tool for my clients, who will ... You're not a web site designer - you're some moron who thinks they are ...
    (microsoft.public.publisher)
  • Re: Intelligent design" makes the 2005 Google Zeitgeist:
    ... Since you appear to be convinced that ID is science then how do you ... designer may change the parameters of our observation at any time. ... In order for facts to remain ... The judge's rulling was based on council from real scientists. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: A voice of sanity in the ID wilderness
    ... Just imagine if our debates centered on likely qualities of a Designer ... A humbler position about Darwinism? ... have been taken only if ID had not been about a religious objection to ... the facts of biology. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Could the global warming models be wrong?
    ... senile nut-cases. ... I have spent a year and a half studying the issue of global warming. ... believed the scare tactics before I read the facts. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: STERN SPIDERMAN owners site up !
    ... hopefully future pins. ... Biography and maybe some other interesting facts about my favorite ... designer. ...
    (rec.games.pinball)