Trying to hear a wisper on the far side of a Beasty_Boys concert.
- From: Jeff…Relf <Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Apr 2006 04:46:26 GMT
Hi Cliff_Wright, Measuring gravity waves is like
trying to hear a wisper on the far side of a Beasty_Boys concert.
They really don't expect any results.
Gravity waves warp Space_Time, not Space per se,
where Time is yet another a _Spatial_ dimension.
You might ask: Why is time spatial in General_Relativity ?
Time is intrinsically spatial, I posit,
and it's only a lack of measurement that makes it seem otherwise.
Einstein believed randomness indicates a lack of measurement, saying:
But the scientist is possessed by the sense of universal causation.
The future, to him, is every whit as necessary and determined as the past.
See WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Albert_Einstein#Religious_views
You might ask: Why is that in the Religious_Views section ?
Einstein believed _True_ theorists are skeptical metaphysicists, saying:
Every _True_ theorist is a kind of tamed metaphysicist,
no matter how pure a positivist he may fancy himself.
...
[ He believes in ] a conceptual system built on premises of great simplicity.
This is called Block_Time, See: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Block_time
As I've said before...
While the spin of the earth and it's path around the sun are well known,
a priori, the spin of a photon and its path are _Never_ fully known,
even after it's, ahem, measured.
So... The key to understanding cosmology and TOEs is noting that
nothing is intrinsically random; instead, some things are simply unknown,
given _Today_'s best observations/theories.
^^^^^
You asked: What is Space_Time warping into ?
In short: Entropy. Entropy is the fifth _Spatial_ dimension, I posit.
Entropy is how dissipated something is,
similar to heat capacity, in joules per kelvin.
See: WikiPedia.ORG/wiki/Entropy
For example, although no place in nature ever had, or ever could have,
infinite Density_and_Heat or perfect Vacuum_and_Coldness,
....infinite Density_and_Heat has no entropy and
perfect Vacuum_and_Coldness has infinite entropy.
The cosmos is going from no entropy to infinite entropy
according to the second law of thermodynamics and
the observed value of General_Relativity's cosmological _Constant_, lambda.
^^^^^^^^
WMAP and SNLS have very precisely pinned down lambda's value.
SNLS' prelimiary data, one tenth of what it hopes to get,
has lambda constant, +- 10 percent, for about the last 12 billion years.
Because gravitational time dilation is a function of the escape velocity,
I posit that things are actually traveling that fast there,
but in a cyclical fashion, and in more dimensions.
Ingoring General_Relativity's Cosmological_Constant for the moment,
gravitational acceleration is a function of the density of mass-energy
and one's proximity to it.
But density is what's left-over from the notional start of the big bang,
that's where gravity came from, and where it's going.
The net mass-energy of the cosmos is known to be _Negative_,
a.k.a. General_Relativity's lambda, a.k.a. GR's cosmological _Constant_,
a.k.a. dark energy, a.k.a. negative pressure... etc.
It takes energy to maintain a vacuum... it's an energy consumer.
e=mcc means: Negative_Pressure = Negative_Energy
Hence, vacuums are gravitationally repulsive and
a perfect vacuum would consume all the energy in the cosmos, and then some.
Likewise, infinite density equates to infinite acceleration,
and, therefore, infinite Unruh radiation,
....emitting more energy than currently exists in the cosmos, and then some.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Serious Query.
- From: cliff wright
- Serious Query.
- Prev by Date: Re: Research into high-temperature superconductors should focus on experiment,not theory
- Next by Date: Re: Anomalous movement resistance in a spinning gyroscope
- Previous by thread: Re: Serious Query.
- Next by thread: Re: Trying to hear a wisper on the far side of a Beasty_Boys concert.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
