Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- From: "FrediFizzx" <fredifizzx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 13:24:09 -0700
"Traveler" <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:qsal325jrn80e70u00ek2qbvevi2q440rf@xxxxxxxxxx
| On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 10:42:26 -0700, "FrediFizzx"
| <fredifizzx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
|
| >Hey hanson,
| >
| >What Old Man said is exactly right and it looks to me to be a very
| >elegant way of saying it. However in most cases, I wouldn't call the
| >mass of a system of two photons "practical mass". ;-)
|
| ahahaha... The crackpot double talk of geriatric physicists never
| ceases to amaze me. ahahaha... I should know better. It's mass but
| it's not really mass. ahahaha...
Hmm... I didn't think the concept of "practical mass" was that hard to
comprehend. But in your case... who knows?
| My favorite so far is this on from fuzzy Fizzie: An electron is a
| massless particle traveling at c within a closed double helix.
| ahahaha... OK. ahahaha... Right.
Guess what, you freakin' moronic jackass; nobody cares about what you
think or have to say. ;-) It's simply a different kind of string theory
with longer strings.
FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- From: Traveler
- Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- References:
- Mass of Light
- From: Billy Bob
- Re: Mass of Light
- From: Old Man
- Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- From: hanson
- Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- From: FrediFizzx
- Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- From: Traveler
- Mass of Light
- Prev by Date: Re: Experiments that measure frequency domain
- Next by Date: Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- Previous by thread: Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- Next by thread: Re: Mass of Light -- OLD MAN Read
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|