Re: Why?

<Starbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1144713019.190938.141820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| FrediFizzx wrote:
| > <Starbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:1144654059.673920.216850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | > > The simplest way to make QFT and GR noncontradictory is simply
to
| > make
| > | > > the gravitational field react to the quantized particle waves,
and
| > to
| > | > > allow said particle waves to operate in any gravitational
field.
| > If
| > | > any
| > | > > paradoxes exist within said theory, or if any observations are
| > | > > inconsistent with said theory, THEN we can go further.
Otherwise,
| > we
| > | > > have neither reason nor evidence that the gravitational field
must
| > be
| > | > > quantized.
| > | >
| > | > If the grav field can't be quantized, then there will be no
| > unification
| > | > with QFT.
| > |
| > | This is where I disagree with you. The gravitational field
contains no
| > | local energy. So why should it be quantized? Even if it did, what
| > | experiment prooves that it follows the same rules?
| >
| > Do you have a mental defect or just a reading comprehension problem?
;-)
| > What you said in your reply has nothing to do with *unification*.
| >
| Yes it does. It just means NOT UNIFYING THE FIELDS UNTIL WE CAN MAKE
| QFT AND GR GET ALONG TOGETHER. Why is it automatically assumed that in
| order to unify QFT with GR, one needs a unified field theory? All we
| need is to make the predictions of GR and the predictions of QFT work
| together. That necessarily means spacetime must have a superposition
| state that is a result of particles or waves around it, and particles
| and waves must have an equation that works in all gravitational
fields.
| Unification of the four forces, or TOE, is different than having a
| covarient field theory, which is what I am asking for.

One more time... What don't you understand about what the Q stands for
in QFT? You certainly do have some kind of comprehension problem.

FrediFizzx
http://www.vacuum-physics.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: gravitation and structure of the universe as predicted by SFT
    ... > that QFT with the correct 'stream-like' fields in place and not the ... particle and wave characterize matter. ... Your beads (particles) ... > communities of this new way of looking at the physics, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Virtual Particles quite confusing
    ... > is never actually needed in QFT, ... I would like to argue with this statement by Wald. ... of particles with given momenta and spin projections. ... Instead of trying to explain quantum field theory ...
    (sci.physics.particle)
  • Re: Virtual Particles quite confusing
    ... > is never actually needed in QFT, ... I would like to argue with this statement by Wald. ... of particles with given momenta and spin projections. ... Instead of trying to explain quantum field theory ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Spin of Quantum Particle and Gravity Mass. (? !)
    ... representations of the Lorentz group for particle states in QFT. ... related to the mean kinetic energy of the gas particles in that frame). ... Of course for some systems the results of some measurements do ... You need to STUDY quantum field theory. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Finite time calculation in QED
    ... QFT _is_ the quantum mechanics of fields. ... Quantum mechanics is about particles and their interactions. ... measured a force acting on test charges from other ...
    (sci.physics.research)