Re: Relation between spinning and precession frequencies of a particle


Traveler wrote:
On 16 Apr 2006 12:17:59 -0700, "ma1ibu" <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

No, I'm someone who doesn't solve
problems by changing the rules.

If the rules are wrong, one must change them.

The rules are intuitively clear. Every familiar object has size.
Particles are part of our familiar world and therefore have size. There
is no need to change the rules and declare that they have no size, on
the ground of an infinite regress problem that vanishes if one accepts
that fundamental particles are really fundamental, i.e. indivisible in
smaller constituents.
--
Arjen Dijksman
--------------------------------
Materion physics, the search for a satisfactory explanation of natural
phenomena at http://materion.free.fr

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Geometric Generalization
    ... I know that there is a current methodology based on the ... WHY IS THERE time, mass, inertia, gravity, relativity, wave-particle ... "All fundamental particles including particles with mass travel at ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Relation between spinning and precession frequencies of a particle
    ... Intuition has little to do with it. ... I was going to say "not fundamental particles" but then I realized ... In fact, the word particle, a classical word meaning ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The fabric of space
    ... But it is Euclidean and *seems* to make gravity. ... Fundamental particles could be a problem but I am ... Do we really care what the gravitational force is between ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Fundamental composition of matter?
    ... described as fundamental particles, meaning they have no sub-structure. ... The experimental data to date shows that electrons and quarks behave ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Fundamental composition of matter?
    ... described as fundamental particles, meaning they have no sub-structure. ... The experimental data to date shows that electrons and quarks behave ...
    (sci.physics)