Re: Physics of the 9/11 building collapses?

Eric Gisse wrote:


hetware wrote:
Eric Gisse wrote:

I was in Alaska at the time but I *do* remember watching the second
plane crash, and I am quite sure that it was a plane. Also, my keen
sense of cause and effect leads me to believe the planes just might
have had something to do with the collapses.

My understanding of physics tells me there was not enough energy in the
gravitational potential energy of the structure to account for the
frocity
with which the building collapsed. Why the buildings were pulled, and
when
the demolition mechanisms were placed is not clear. I do, however,
believe all three buildings were taken down in an intentional controlled
demolition.

You are a fucking moron.

Why don't you put in some 9/11 conspiracy links in your sig? They will
go in well with the holocaust denial links.

I ran this by my Dad who worked as a US DoT safety engineer for 40 years.
His area of expertise was guard rails and other roadside features; finding
the best ways to dissipate energy as a vehicle impacted something like a
the end of a concrete median strip (AKA, Jersey Wall - which he helped
design). At first he was skeptical because he had seen reports from people
who claimed to be experts in the area of structural engineering that
treated the building collapses as a resolved problem. When I put it in
terms that matched his experience, he no longer doubted that there is
something very wrong with the official version.

--
http://www.vho.org/GB/c/DC/gcgvcole.html
http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/
http://www.germarrudolf.com/
http://www.ice.gov/graphics/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm
.

Quantcast