Re: a "force field" for tanks?

On a sunny day (Fri, 21 Apr 2006 02:59:03 +0000 (UTC)) it happened
glhansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote in
<e29hpn$hc0$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:


The tank, if its radars keep triggering on that foil, it will
keep firing..... until it runs out [of ammo].

If you were designing an armor defense system, can you think of any way
to distinguish an actual threat from the clutter, and do you think it
would be a good idea to try?

Of course. If it fires at any strip of foil that drifts past, it would be
firing on any friendly soldier that walks by, too! Distinguishing signal
from noise is the hard part of automating just about anything having to do
with ground vehicle operations. They've had robot planes that can take
off and land for years, but a robot truck that can drive through the woods
is still an active area of research.

I am well aware of that, of course they have (probably Doppler based) system
and signal processing, but consider this problem:

{ {
| {
* [ [
{


The asterix is the radar (tank), the other symbols the alu foil.
When one piece of alu foil falls faster, and passes in front of
one that is further away, the radar may well see that as a fast approach.

I know filters (very well actually).
Have played with doppler radar.
You can put it on audio too, anything causes a signal.
Chances of an error increase dramatically with all that foil.
But indeed maybe they have very advanced signal processing.



I know very little about the system, but I can tell you with confidence
that it is a system that distinguishes threat from clutter. It must be
so, or it would be inoperable. I call it my "They're not as dumb as you
think they are" theory.

Well :-) the US anti missile missile system still has not figured out after
all those billions how to tell apart a fake and real warhead.
[or even hit any type 10 out of 10]
Do not put too much faith in electronics.


I really do not know that.
It seems to me the radar domes makes a good target for a sniper too.
he can shoot these to pieces from sat 100 meters or more.

Well, flat panel radars at "strategic locations", I believe the article
said. Phased array radars, I would suppose. Couldn't tell you what a
sniper's bullet would do to it, but I'd imagine that taking out an
emitter would leave an impaired but still operational system.

Yes, some of the plastic microwave lenses could be very vulnerable.
There also exist mesh grids to focus microwaves, also vulnerable.

Wel you buy them here:
http://www.amazing1.com/emp.htm

Um... no. Against a Ford Escort, maybe. Against a vehicle designed to
operate in a nuclear theater, no.

The tanks will be (mil requires that) EMP proof, but communication will likely be no
longer possible (because of the noise).
That will hit them hard.


I was thinking of jamming rather than frying.

Agreed. Frying would be a lucky shot.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: a "force field" for tanks?
    ... If you were designing an armor defense system, can you think of any way ... The asterix is the radar, the other symbols the alu foil. ... But jamming signals is, I think, harder than you think it is. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Off-The-Shelf UWB Radars?
    ... patents about UWB and signal processing. ... articles presuppose the reader already understands and has done narrowband ... Radar analysis before. ... signal processing M files/tutorials would also be of great benefit, ...
    (comp.dsp)
  • Re: Mass and Point
    ... I will condescending suggest you study more and suggest the well know text "Spotlight-Mode Synthetic Aperture Radar: A Signal Processing Approach" by C. Jakowatz et. al. ... I was and have always been referring to modern sophisticated receiver circuitry that performs a downconversion to baseband with the I and Q signals then digitized and downloaded to the ground. ... Then you should not have misunderstood the reflectivity issues. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: a "force field" for tanks?
    ... When one piece of alu foil falls faster, ... Target A and which one is Target B. ... Perhaps the projectiles have some guidence themselves. ... Modern miniaturization could do it (bullet that uses radar to steer to target). ...
    (sci.physics)