Why we cannot have SR without GR, unless we get rid of acceleration.
- From: Starbles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 22 Apr 2006 15:48:40 -0700
QFT won't work outside of curved space. Now it may be true that we will
need discontinuities in GR for it to work, we cannot give up curved
space completely.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rigid_disk.html
Now, I dare you to disprove this. John Baez is certainly NOT a crank.
There is nothing essentially invalid about accelerating rotating
frames.
There is also nothing incompatible between Gravity and Thermodynamics.
However, people's minds make them incompatible because they are unable
to use their imaginations. Or more importantly, use the imagination and
skill in physics to come up with a theory compatible with our
experiences.
BTW, the reason I say Gravity and Thermodyamics is because I can show
you what ideas had to be recociled.
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/jhs/strings/string11.html
There's Gravity, Reference frame invariance, Electromagnetism, and
Thermodynamics to be considered. No theory has all four of these
things.
If we want a TOE, we must open our minds.
(...Starblade Riven Darksquall...)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why we cannot have SR without GR, unless we get rid of acceleration.
- From: Edward Green
- Re: Why we cannot have SR without GR, unless we get rid of acceleration.
- From: Paul Cardinale
- Re: Why we cannot have SR without GR, unless we get rid of acceleration.
- Prev by Date: Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes'
- Next by Date: Re: Physics help
- Previous by thread: Physical Wave vs Probability Wave
- Next by thread: Re: Why we cannot have SR without GR, unless we get rid of acceleration.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|