Re: Apollo's Laser Reflecting 'Corner Cubes'

Roy L. Fuchs,
It's put up or shut up time.

If our warm and fuzzy NASA can use subjective infomercial-science and
their conditional laws of physics on behalf of their "standard
argument", then why can't I?

BTW; if you folks so happen to see any of the official color/colour
images, that which if necessary I'll gladly point those nifty images
out, of our moon as being a rather deep golden brownish (iron and
titanium deposited) nasty orb with a few patches of other deeply rich
colors of other raw elements as having a good deal of a nearly coal
likeness of a carbon/soot covered basalt that's badly strewn from top
to bottom and from side to side with meteorite an asteroid impacts and
absolutel loads of their secondary impact shards, along with that of
our bluish looking Earth and/or any other nearby colorful planet as
situated in the same frame for giving yourself a perfectly good and
honest to God color spectrum and illumination/albedo basis of
reference, whereas just forget all about the relatively darkish nature
and of those rich colors of our moon because, according to the official
Apollo EVAs of their having taken actual unfiltered Kodak moments, our
moon is extensively 55+% reflective, as coated almost entirely with a
relatively clean and thin layer of 50/50 portland cement and cornmeal,
without there being any hint of such being the least bit UV or much
less gamma reactive nor even electrostatic charged.

http://www.greatdreams.com/moon/darkmoon.htm
Pay no attention to the opening image, in that there's no lunar rover
tracks (lots more officially archived images having depicted the very
same trackless environment yet otherwise within the same frame as being
entirely moonboot clumping just fine and dandy, and yet there's not the
least bit of any brownish elements anywhere in sight (must have been
the thick sodium atmosphere that's otherwise having made our moon look
so brownish), hardly if any strewn meteorites, and there's no other
items ever depicted in the crystal clear black sky even though there's
a good couple of dozen of worthy items that should have been within the
DR of Kodak film, and at least a few of those items as could have been
easily depicted, especially of Sirius and the likes of Venus as being
unavoidably situated within a few frames.

So much for their stinking "peer review" that's based almost entirely
upon infomercial-crapolla. How many thousands of my words and of
hard-science proven facts would you folks like to peer review?

LIST OF STANDARD ARGUMENTS: (pick any one of the following)

Kodak moments, their DR and as having been optically unfiltered?

Lunar landers w/o reaction wheels and dealing with mascons?

Standard laws of secondary/recoil radiation physics?

Primary + secondary IR = physically damn hot, hot, hot?

Sodium plus other heavier elements of the lunar atmosphere?

Terrestrial moon rocks; as in how many mega tonnes would you like?

Select any of the above, or simply create another topic of your own;
such as the extremely inert massive Saturn-V/(Saturn 5) that supposedly
made it all possible (key words being "inert massive").
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~
Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason why honest
folks are having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been
playing by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) having invented WMD seems to come to mind.

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Apollo 13: Was LM gear ever extended?
    ... moon is extremely good for many sciences that are obviously related to ... folks like yourself are into serious drugs and of sustaining more self ... This topic is all about those original lunar landers that never quite ... Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond; WAR is WAR, ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: What were the flashes and bogies during the apollo missions?
    ... If those Apollo crew were in fact anywhere near the moon, ... lunar atmospheric storm that fed the massive sodium rail of atoms to ... All images and site content are Copyright ©2002-2005 by Russell ... War is war, thus "in war there are no rules" - In fact, war has been ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: If the moon landing was faked...
    ... Obviously you're not looking for the truth, such as "If the moon ... Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, ... How about the regular laws of physics that simply do not add up to what ... Where do you get your numbers on the light reflecting capabilities of ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Moon Hoax people
    ... >the Moon than there is that says we didn't go there. ... lunar surface. ... Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree far beyond; WAR is WAR, ... by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident warlord. ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-)
    ... record and video footage shot by NASA astronauts and questions ... Colliers "Was it only a Paper Moon?". ... Was the Lunar Module tested on Earth? ... In a vacuum there is no heat? ...
    (sci.astro)