Re: If Infinity Existed There Would Be No Space For Us Left




Sam Wormley wrote:
Global Spider wrote:
Infinity Would Take Up Everything.

Try again.

Infinity
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Infinity.html


Hi Sam,

I helped write that.

The universe is infinite.

Here, where others disagree, about the powerset result, infinite sets
are equivalent. That's where a universe of anything in a theory would
be its own powerset, Cantor's "paradox", an antinomy of mathematical
logic that applies to these theories of things or theories of
everything, as it were.

Indeed, I even promote an axiomless system of natural deduction, A
theory, as, metatheoretically, the only possible Theory of Everything.

Ross

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Relative Cardinality
    ... particle could be in (not that our universe is neccessairly like this, ... BTW, even if there are only 10^100 particles, the configurations of the ... Your WMcardinality can reasonably be ... Then you only have one WMcardinality for infinite sets ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Relative Cardinality
    ... > finitely many particles in the universe, ... I seem to recall that WMCardinality is inconsistent. ... Then you only have one WMcardinality for infinite sets ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... Tony Orlow wrote: ... >> that all infinite sets are the same size. ... >> The universe is infinite, and, that's empirical proof that infinite ... > its membership in the set P. Whaddya think, Ross? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Request for Peer Review - Refutation of Cantor Theorem Conclusion
    ... If D is an element of the powerset, ... Looking over some of his messages, I think Scott may be starting out by ... prove an inconsistency in a set theory that adds that, ... for example where there is a universe and there is no universe in ZF ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Cantor and the binary tree
    ... >> monadic objects are monadic objects, and so the universe is infinite ... >> and infinite sets are equivalent. ... About the naturals and reals, you say that there can be no algorithmic ...
    (sci.math)