Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: Sam Wormley <swormley1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:16:30 GMT
ma1ibu wrote:
You are saying that part of what is trying to go
in is deflected away- back out- as relatavistic
jets of matter.
So you are saying that MOST of what goes into
the BH stays in.
Hmm. Must be an unlimited supply, hey?
What I'm saying is everything CYCLES through the
BH. It constantly RENEWS the galaxy. Your
idea is untenable. Mine is not.
Your idea makes no long-term sense, because
you insist on talking beginnings and endings
with nothing to put before or after.
My teeth are gold, my hat is old,
now my story is all told.
(-:
John
Your idea is untenable, John. Gravity wins except for
what gets shot out in the jets and radiated away as
part of the accretion disk dynamics.
My hat is chocolate so I can eat it now and then if
I have to.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- References:
- High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: ma1ibu
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: ma1ibu
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: Sam Wormley
- Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- From: ma1ibu
- High-Mileage Black Holes
- Prev by Date: Re: HUP misunderstood (ping Bilge, Gregory...)
- Next by Date: Re: I smoked their stuff.
- Previous by thread: Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- Next by thread: Re: High-Mileage Black Holes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|