Re: We are, a mass extinction event.
- From: rick_sobie@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 1 May 2006 16:10:49 -0700
What's the story on particle physics?
Well I am going to be exceeding kind here, far more kind than I should
be, and say firstly, that CERN, is a place of business. Simply put. It
does not do real science.
It takes the entrails of small animals, and it scatters them on the
ground, and it divines meaning from them, and then names the various
bits in accordance with the Monty Python naming convention.
Somehow because they made it look like science, they got away with it
and absconded with billions and billions of dollars and others followed
this business model and did the same in other places.
It is an electro magnet. That is what a particle accellerator is.
http://www.fnal.gov/pub/inquiring/timeline/10.html
Top right is an image of the bubbles made in a detector of liquid when
supposed particles impacted a target perhaps of a-loo-min-ee-um.
At any rate rate from there is gets more strange as they create tools
to show that particles are actually travelling down the accellerator,
being accellerated by of course electrom magnetism along the length of
the thing and well what is a particle again?
Is it a little piece of dust or rock perhaps?
No it is not. No solid matter of any kind including quarks have ever
been found, although some have claimed that quarks are the closest
thing to solid, although of course that is just made up science.
An instaneous point particle is now and always was even in its
inception, a mathematical construct.
You have to remember that at the time of Maxwell all was waves.
Then came quanta, and so well light is in packets, we will call these
quanta we will call these particles.
Light is not little bits of dust. Light is not made of particles. It is
waves. We know that. It just behaves like it was a particle in that it
can knock things around as if were a little projectile. It is
considered to be a wave packet. You know the crest of the wave that one
complete up and down of a wave of light.
Did you know that they used to think light was a ray. Not a wave.
A ray of light.
So anyways a particle is where an interaction occurs in spacetime.
Now since it is all waves, you can't really examine things well because
waves are smeared out things unless you say, well lets take one point,
on this wave, and lets say that exact point here, where two waves meet,
just there, not the entire wave, but just right there, lets freeze that
frame and see what we have in the way of energy right at that point.
So to do that, you freeze the frame, and now you have a spot, that
contains energy.
It is a spot at xyz.
Now you know that in reality you can't freeze time, but you are here
and you are calling it an instaneous point particle because you are
saying that it is travelling at c, and we are making assumptions such
as perfect elasticity and such and all so that we can take an area,
and treat it like a field. Like a field of stones, which was inspired
Faraday.
So you have a field of points, imaginary points. And under certain
circu,stances you can predict what the energy will be there, at a more
precise point, than if you were to simply use wave theory.
So that is what a particle is.
Now what do these business people who are taking your money, lead you
to believe it is again?
Well they are liars. And they make a damn good living lby decieving
you, and they are very good at it, and they have made it their career.
To name parts of a wave, where it interacts with another wave at a
predicted value and then to call that interaction a particle, as if it
was a real bit of dust or something.
Then they go on to say well it decays.
You mean the wave peters out?
How strange is that.
You mean that little wave doesn't doesn;t exist forever?
No it is not a stable element, it is a farton, please give me the Nobel
prize and give us another 50 billion dollars in grant money to employ
these Harvard graduates so they don't need to drive buses, and you go
OK, here you go,
And what did you ever get from it?
Lasers?
No. They were reverse engineered from the crash at Roswell New Mexico
like most of the technological advances of the last 100 years.
What you bought with your money, is new words, like hadron, lepton,
gluon, and which are all part of the farton, class of made up fairy
particles.
So why is there resistance from places like CERN against things like
the Huchison effect, or Cold Fusion or zero point energy?
Because these things expose all of these particle physicists as a bunch
of frauds.
Now how do you think, you are ever going to get to real science from
there?
Only if the people do not use this silly made up stuff, but rather do
their work themselves and that is what they do in laboratories all over
the world, and don't say anything about places like CERN, or else of
course they themselves would not be published in any scientific
journals.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event.
- From: rick_sobie
- Re: We are, a mass extinction event.
- Prev by Date: Re: rolling and sliding objects
- Next by Date: Re: Degrees of Freedom confusion
- Previous by thread: Re: Cold Storage (OT?)
- Next by thread: Re: We are, a mass extinction event.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
