Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- From: Greg Hansen <glhansen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 18:33:48 -0500
Stolen_Humanity@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
It seems very few people are willing to argue the merits of respective
GUTs, and spend more effort arguing with cranks, which requires very
little thinking, than actually analyzing the merits of contemporary
physics.
If someone were to discuss SU(4)xSU(2)xSU(2), how long would it take them just to sit down with pencil and paper and work out the Lagrangian? Longer than I intend to stay online tonight. Maybe someone like Bilge has a mature enough understanding of group symmetries in physics that he can meaningfully contribute, but it would take someone like myself a lot longer to form an opinion. Arguing with cranks takes less time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- From: Stolen_Humanity
- Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- References:
- SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- From: Stolen_Humanity
- SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- Prev by Date: Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 28 Apr 06 Washington, DC
- Next by Date: Re: Super strong neutron source started up
- Previous by thread: Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- Next by thread: Re: SU(4)×SU(2)×SU(2)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
