Re: We are, a mass extinction event.

Is there a solution to all this?
Yes there is. It is really about finding the right terminology. Finding
ways to incorporate current science work, into the paradigm, which is
basically just the text books.
The work itself is being done, and is available on the net for study.
All of it other than that which is propretary and then that is kept
secret like any industrial secrets.
But there is a huge gap, between what is taught, and what is being done
in the field.
For instance, people say well Zero point energy doesn't exist. They
said that for a number of years but then people said, well the Casimir
effect is merely an example of zero point energy.
So then they said yes but it is too weak an effect you would need
plates the size of th euniverse and bla bla bla well that of course is
bs, so enter the Ptterson beads, spheres, instead of plates, and there
you go, a more efficient example of zero point energy because of course
the shell radius is a sphere, not a square, so it only makes sense that
shperes, would allow better interfacing with the zero point field.

So is zero point a btter term, than cold fusion? Well it is less
threatening to particle physics isn't it.

So people will accept zero point energy, but they don't want to accept
cold fusion.

It was interesting to me when a botanist said well what is
photosynthesis then if not cold fusion.

So really it is almost a war of words isn't it.

And getting people to accept new science is really about finding a
nicer way to introduce it.
A way that is non threatening.

And you know, just like quantum physics, is a different branch of
physics when compared to Newtonian physics, and the New Physics, as it
is sometimes called, is about Zero Point Energy, Cold Fusion, the
Huchison Effect, electro gravitics, and the like.
But just calling it the New Physics is not a very good term. It needs a
better name.

People like to say well these things are like Tesla Technology.

Really there needs to be more effort towards separating these things
from the other branches of physics, into teritory of its own, and in
that way the other branches be they real or made up science, will not
feel threatened.

Just like a small group of people took the bull by the horns and made
up quantum physics, the same needs to be done with zero point engery
type physics.
New words, new terms for the same ideas, and there will be less
resistance and more cooperation towards development.
That is really how you have to do it, and it is a shame that string
theory is really too far out there to be realistic, because that sort
of thing, would be ideal for a new methodology.
Terms like quantum foam have been used as well but then as soon as you
say quantum, well then it must be this or that.

So it is best to just distance yourself. It is difficult but probably
the best way to move ahead in this promising field.

.