Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?


franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello,

In view of above I have few questios:-

1.Why/how gravity and graviton can't be considered as prime force and
prime particle of all forces and particles?

2. Can indicated four fundamental forces be converted, destroed or
diluted to some other fource in view of above quote?

Sorry, pls tell in less technical language.

Best Wishes

According to my TOE which can be found at:

http://www.geocities.com/franklinhu/theory.html

This whole idea of exchange particles is just NUTS!

In my view, all forces are exchanged via phased wave interactions of
the aether which is just composed of a sea of neutrons. If you're
looking for the graviton, I think you will find that the
electromagnetic wave turns out to the graviton force carrier.

Also by my view, the strong and weak force do not exist. These are
forces that had to be 'made up' in order to explain the compact
Rutherford nucleus. I explain in my TOE that the nucleus of atoms is
not composed of a tightly packed ball of protons and neutrons that
would obviously fly apart. Instead of inventing the strong force, I
composed the atom of an alternating array of protons/electrons/neutrons
which form a stable and much larger space occupying atom. This model
has no need of a strong force.

The electromagnetic force is obviously an electromagnetic wave - so
what is gravity. It also turns out to have an electromagnetic source.
Large masses tend to be lacking in electrons and so are slightly
positively charged. It is this slight charge imbalance which causes all
neutral matter to be attracted to the Earth. Where do you think the
300000 volt difference between the ground and stratosphere comes from?
What causes lighting? It is the charging of the Earth. We are stuck to
the Earth like a piece of paper is stuck to a balloon you have rubbed
on your head. How is that for non-technical?

So all forces can be united as the electromagnetic force. If you want
to see more detail, read my TOE.

fhutoe

Thanks, but this is something different and more technical for me.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?
    ... 1.Why/how gravity and graviton can't be considered as prime force and ... This whole idea of exchange particles is just NUTS! ... looking for the graviton, I think you will find that the ... Large masses tend to be lacking in electrons and so are slightly ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Can gravity be considered as prime force?
    ... 1.Why/how gravity and graviton can't be considered as prime force and ... This whole idea of exchange particles is just NUTS! ... looking for the graviton, I think you will find that the ... Large masses tend to be lacking in electrons and so are slightly ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Slabinski and Mingst/Stowe disagree in Pushing Gravity
    ... > Where q is the power flux per unit area of the graviton field. ... > mass we say, ... > N = graviton particle density (particles per unit volume) ... > interacting material particle... ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Reactionless Redux
    ... graviton beam, but only propitiously arranged (per the wavelength of ... the beam) very dense masses would absorb any great part of the beam ... except with superpartners of all the ship's constituent particles ... it doesn't conserve linear momentum. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)
  • Re: Reactionless Redux
    ... graviton beam, but only propitiously arranged (per the wavelength of ... the beam) very dense masses would absorb any great part of the beam ... momentum changes by +/-2. ... the particles that make up a spacecraft into tachyons, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.science)